290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24444057)
21. Highly efficient generation of biallelic reporter gene knock-in mice via CRISPR-mediated genome editing of ESCs.
Wang Y; Li J; Xiang J; Wen B; Mu H; Zhang W; Han J
Protein Cell; 2016 Feb; 7(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 26661644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. From engineering to editing the rat genome.
Meek S; Mashimo T; Burdon T
Mamm Genome; 2017 Aug; 28(7-8):302-314. PubMed ID: 28752194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Genome editing with programmable site-specific nucleases].
Yamamoto T; Sakamoto N; Sakuma T
Uirusu; 2014; 64(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 25765983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Generation of eGFP and Cre knockin rats by CRISPR/Cas9.
Ma Y; Ma J; Zhang X; Chen W; Yu L; Lu Y; Bai L; Shen B; Huang X; Zhang L
FEBS J; 2014 Sep; 281(17):3779-90. PubMed ID: 25039742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genetic correction using engineered nucleases for gene therapy applications.
Li HL; Nakano T; Hotta A
Dev Growth Differ; 2014 Jan; 56(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 24329887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening methods to identify TALEN-mediated knockout mice.
Nakagawa Y; Yamamoto T; Suzuki K; Araki K; Takeda N; Ohmuraya M; Sakuma T
Exp Anim; 2014; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24521866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. RNA-dependent DNA endonuclease Cas9 of the CRISPR system: Holy Grail of genome editing?
Gasiunas G; Siksnys V
Trends Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 21(11):562-7. PubMed ID: 24095303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Proven and novel strategies for efficient editing of the human genome.
Mussolino C; Mlambo T; Cathomen T
Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 24():105-12. PubMed ID: 26342909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Generation of Rag1-knockout immunodeficient rats and mice using engineered meganucleases.
Ménoret S; Fontanière S; Jantz D; Tesson L; Thinard R; Rémy S; Usal C; Ouisse LH; Fraichard A; Anegon I
FASEB J; 2013 Feb; 27(2):703-11. PubMed ID: 23150522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Molecular biology. New tool for genome surgery.
van der Oost J
Science; 2013 Feb; 339(6121):768-70. PubMed ID: 23413345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Generation of Knock-In Mouse by Genome Editing.
Fujii W
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():99-109. PubMed ID: 36773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Targeted genome editing in pluripotent stem cells using zinc-finger nucleases.
Bobis-Wozowicz S; Osiak A; Rahman SH; Cathomen T
Methods; 2011 Apr; 53(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21185378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is the age of genetic surgery finally upon us?
Kmiec EB
Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 24(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 25936245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Feasibility for a large scale mouse mutagenesis by injecting CRISPR/Cas plasmid into zygotes.
Mashiko D; Young SA; Muto M; Kato H; Nozawa K; Ogawa M; Noda T; Kim YJ; Satouh Y; Fujihara Y; Ikawa M
Dev Growth Differ; 2014 Jan; 56(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 24372541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Application and potential of genome engineering by artificial enzymes].
Nomura W
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 25759050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis.
Guo X; Zhang T; Hu Z; Zhang Y; Shi Z; Wang Q; Cui Y; Wang F; Zhao H; Chen Y
Development; 2014 Feb; 141(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 24401372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The application of transcription activator-like effector nucleases for genome editing in C. elegans.
Yi P; Li W; Ou G
Methods; 2014 Aug; 68(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 24780522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Generation of Knock-in Mouse by Genome Editing.
Fujii W
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1630():91-100. PubMed ID: 28643252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization.
Araki M; Ishii T
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Nov; 12():108. PubMed ID: 25420886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Challenges to increasing targeting efficiency in genome engineering.
Horii T; Hatada I
J Reprod Dev; 2016; 62(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 26688299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
