These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2444410)

  • 41. Optimal placement of bipolar surface EMG electrodes in the face based on single motor unit analysis.
    Lapatki BG; Oostenveld R; Van Dijk JP; Jonas IE; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):299-314. PubMed ID: 20003170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Wave properties of action potentials from fast and slow motor units of rats.
    Wakeling JM; Syme DA
    Muscle Nerve; 2002 Nov; 26(5):659-68. PubMed ID: 12402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV; Andreassen S
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nervous propagation along 'central' motor pathways in intact man: characteristics of motor responses to 'bifocal' and 'unifocal' spine and scalp non-invasive stimulation.
    Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Caramia M; Roma V; Zarola F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 Oct; 61(4):272-86. PubMed ID: 2411506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive?
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1554-60. PubMed ID: 8941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Conduction velocity along muscle fibers in situ in healthy infants.
    Cruz Martínez A; López Terradas JM
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Nov; 30(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 2261890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric electrodes: physiologic implications.
    Dumitru D; King JC; Nandedkar SD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Oct; 105(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 9362996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Changes of the average muscle fiber conduction velocity during a varying force contraction.
    Sadoyama T; Masuda T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Nov; 67(5):495-7. PubMed ID: 2444419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: Turns and amplitude measurements.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1986 Jun; 9(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 3724788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Motor unit tracking with high-density surface EMG.
    Maathuis EM; Drenthen J; van Dijk JP; Visser GH; Blok JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Dec; 18(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 18996724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Computer simulation study of the shape of motor unit action potential.
    Piotrkiewicz M
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1988; 39(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 3421135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions.
    Farina D; Falla D
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 18085714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rise time or rise rate: which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?
    Masakado Y; Akaboshi K; Kimura A; Chino N
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 40(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 11039123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrode placement and muscle action potentials amplitudes.
    Burke JF
    Phys Ther; 1973 Feb; 53(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 4685032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Short term bed-rest reduces conduction velocity of individual motor units in leg muscles.
    Cescon C; Gazzoni M
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Oct; 20(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 20403710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Spatial distribution of surface action potentials generated by individual motor units in the human biceps brachii muscle.
    Rodriguez-Falces J; Negro F; Gonzalez-Izal M; Farina D
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Aug; 23(4):766-77. PubMed ID: 23619102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of F-waves of motor unit action potentials activated during voluntary contraction.
    Yamada M
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15008022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Coherence between surface electromyograms is influenced by electrode placement in hand muscles.
    Keenan KG; Collins JD; Massey WV; Walters TJ; Gruszka HD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Jan; 195(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21074555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reliability of measurement of muscle fiber conduction velocity using surface EMG.
    Harba MI; Teng LY
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1999; 9(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 10354908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.