These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24445030)

  • 1. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions.
    Cerqueira NM; Ozcan M; Gonçalves M; da Rocha DM; Vasconcellos DK; Bottino MA; Yener-Salihoğlu E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 22442773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):658-62. PubMed ID: 24836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
    Raviv E; Hanna J; Raviv R; Harel-Raviv M
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complete arch implant impression technique.
    Ma J; Rubenstein JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):405-10. PubMed ID: 22633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.