134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24445796)
1. [Turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical heart valves].
Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Kupper W; Laas J
Z Kardiol; 2001 Dec; 90(Suppl 6):100-4. PubMed ID: 24445796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical heart valves].
Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Kupper W; Laas J
Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():100-4. PubMed ID: 11826811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical aortic valves.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Laas J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 48(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 11145405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Downstream turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) following aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Hall or St. Jude Medical valve substitutes.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Laas J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Jan; 17(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10735407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.
Kleine P; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Simon A; Moritz A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 12479289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.
Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Paulsen PK; Riis C; Laas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 9793855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.
Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of high intensity transient signals on the choice of mechanical aortic valve substitutes.
Laas J; Kseibi S; Perthel M; Klingbeil A; El-Ayoubi L; Alken A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Jan; 23(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 12493511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves.
Masters RG; Helou J; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A turbulence in vitro assessment of On-X and St Jude Medical prostheses.
Hatoum H; Maureira P; Dasi LP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Jan; 159(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 30905419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Turbulent stress measurements downstream of six mechanical aortic valves in a pulsatile flow model.
Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Giersiepen M; Reul H; Stødkilde-Jørgensen H
J Biomech; 1988; 21(8):631-45. PubMed ID: 3170618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage(TM) bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM.
Kleine P; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Moritz A
Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 10(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 12379409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics.
Laas J; Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H
Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Sep; 68(3):1096-9. PubMed ID: 10510028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow dynamics of surgical and transcatheter aortic valves: Past to present.
Hatoum H; Ahn S; Lilly S; Maureira P; Crestanello J; Thourani VH; Dasi LP
JTCVS Open; 2022 Mar; 9():43-56. PubMed ID: 36003460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Turbulent stress measurements downstream of three bileaflet heart valve designs in pigs.
Nyboe C; Funder JA; Smerup MH; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Jun; 29(6):1008-13. PubMed ID: 16675253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro velocity and turbulence measurements in the vicinity of three new mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Omni-Carbon, and Duromedics.
Yoganathan AP; Sung HW; Woo YR; Jones M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 May; 95(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 3361941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Turbulent stresses downstream of porcine and pericardial aortic valves implanted in pigs.
Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Pedersen EM; Ostergaard JH; Paulsen PK; Johannsen G
J Card Surg; 1989 Mar; 4(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 2519985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
