160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24446150)
1. An empirically informed critique of Habermas' argument from human nature.
Morar N
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Feb; 21(1):95-113. PubMed ID: 24446150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The silencing of Kierkegaard in Habermas' critique of genetic enhancement.
Christiansen K
Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Jun; 12(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 19234761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ambiguity in Habermas's argument against liberal eugenics.
Schäfer LP
Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 31463995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autonomy, natality and freedom: a liberal re-examination of Habermas in the enhancement debate.
Pugh J
Bioethics; 2015 Mar; 29(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24547807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas.
Fenton E
Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 17278871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The hermeneutic challenge of genetic engineering: Habermas and the transhumanists.
Edgar A
Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Jun; 12(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19219641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.
Murphy TF
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):335-42. PubMed ID: 23025348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 'My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm': an argument against moral enhancement.
Tonkens R
J Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 41(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 24748649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.
Selgelid MJ
Med Health Care Philos; 2014 Feb; 17(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 23728949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene-environment interaction: why genetic enhancement might never be distributed fairly.
Prince S
J Med Ethics; 2024 Mar; 50(4):272-277. PubMed ID: 37268408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is moral bioenhancement dangerous?
Drake N
J Med Ethics; 2016 Jan; 42(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 26552998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement.
Carter S
J Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 41(10):825-9. PubMed ID: 26265725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancement and the ethics of development.
Buchanan A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Mar; 18(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 18561576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotechnology and the creation of ethics.
Coletta RR
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 15709268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moral enhancement via direct emotion modulation: a reply to John Harris.
Douglas T
Bioethics; 2013 Mar; 27(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 22092503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tying oneself to the mast: One necessary cost to morally enhancing oneself biomedically.
Rumbold B
Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):543-551. PubMed ID: 28614616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Could it be permissible to prevent the existence of morally enhanced people?
Persson I
J Med Ethics; 2012 Nov; 38(11):692-3. PubMed ID: 22918293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remarks on Habermas's presentation of "L'avenir de la nature humaine".
Lafont C
APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 3(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 15115010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Habermas, human agency, and human genetic enhancement -- the grown, the made, and responsibility for actions.
Herissone-Kelly P
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Apr; 21(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 22377073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.
Agar N
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 30570459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
