145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24446230)
1. Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?
Hansen NL; Kuhl CK; Barabasch A; Strobel K; Schrading S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 24446230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should breast MRI be performed with adjustment for the phase in patients' menstrual cycle? Correlation between mammographic density, age, and background enhancement on breast MRI without adjusting for the phase in patients' menstrual cycle.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Watanabe J
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1539-42. PubMed ID: 21592704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in positron emission mammography (PEM): correlation with mammographic density and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI.
Koo HR; Moon WK; Chun IK; Eo JS; Jeyanth JX; Chang JM; Cho N; Kang KW
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1738-42. PubMed ID: 23806533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Baltzer P; Langs G; Weber M; Bogner W; Gruber S; Trattnig S; Pinker K
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25333307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound.
Ko ES; Lee BH; Choi HY; Kim RB; Noh WC
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20709479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Background uptake of breast-specific gamma imaging: correlation with mammographic breast density and background enhancement of breast MRI.
Kim MY; Choi N; Ko SM; Chung HW
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24461560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findings?
Moy L; Elias K; Patel V; Lee J; Babb JS; Toth HK; Mercado CL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):986-93. PubMed ID: 19770320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort.
Klifa C; Carballido-Gamio J; Wilmes L; Laprie A; Shepherd J; Gibbs J; Fan B; Noworolski S; Hylton N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19631485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast density.
Scaranelo AM; Carrillo MC; Fleming R; Jacks LM; Kulkarni SR; Crystal P
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 23418005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Background enhancement of mammary glandular tissue on breast dynamic MRI: imaging features and effect on assessment of breast cancer extent.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Watanabe J
Breast Cancer; 2012 Jul; 19(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 21618028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploiting sparsity in x-f space for higher spatiotemporal resolution in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
Usman M; Ramsay EA; Siegler P; Plewes DB; Chan RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S171-3. PubMed ID: 23083578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kinetic characterization of non-mass lesions on breast MRI using manual and computer assisted methods.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S177-8. PubMed ID: 23083580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography.
Kim WH; Moon WK; Kim SM; Yi A; Chang JM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1724-30. PubMed ID: 23727379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
