392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24446478)
1. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.
Furukawa N; Kuss O; Aboud A; Schönbrodt M; Renner A; Hakim Meibodi K; Becker T; Zittermann A; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. PubMed ID: 24446478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A one-to-one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis.
Furukawa N; Kuss O; Emmel E; Scholtz S; Scholtz W; Fujita B; Ensminger S; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 156(5):1825-1834. PubMed ID: 29861110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial clinical experience with minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.
Abjigitova D; Veen KM; Mokhles MM; Bekkers JA; Oei FB; Bogers AJ
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2021 Jun; 62(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 33302611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.
Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH
Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.
Bowdish ME; Hui DS; Cleveland JD; Mack WJ; Sinha R; Ranjan R; Cohen RG; Baker CJ; Cunningham MJ; Barr ML; Starnes VA
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 25750007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery.
Byrne JG; Karavas AN; Adams DH; Aklog L; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Rizzo RJ; Cohn LH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Sep; 18(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 10973536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).
Aliahmed HMA; Karalius R; Valaika A; Grebelis A; Semėnienė P; Čypienė R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Apr; 54(2):. PubMed ID: 30344257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined Mitral and Aortic Valve Procedure via Right Mini-Thoracotomy versus Full Median Sternotomy.
Zhao D; Wei L; Zhu S; Zhang Z; Liu H; Yang Y; Wang Y; Ji Q; Wang C
Int Heart J; 2019 Mar; 60(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 30799378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Aortic Root Replacement with Valved Conduits through Partial Upper Sternotomy.
Hillebrand J; Alshakaki M; Martens S; Scherer M
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 28201842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.
Glauber M; Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Ferrarini M; Bevilacqua S; Farneti PA; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 May; 145(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22516391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trans-right axillary aortic valve replacement: propensity-matched comparison with standard sternotomy approach.
Tokoro M; Ito T; Maekawa A; Sawaki S; Yanagisawa J; Ozeki T; Orii M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 25(4):521-525. PubMed ID: 28962509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
