These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24446695)
1. Comparison of the prevalence of surgical site infection with use of sterile versus nonsterile gloves for resection and reconstruction during Mohs surgery. Mehta D; Chambers N; Adams B; Gloster H Dermatol Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 24446695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can Nonsterile Gloves for Dermatologic Procedures Be Cost-Effective without Compromising Infection Rates? Kemp DM; Weingarten S; Chervoneva I; Marley W Skinmed; 2019; 17(3):155-159. PubMed ID: 31496469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infection rates of wound repairs during Mohs micrographic surgery using sterile versus nonsterile gloves: a prospective randomized pilot study. Xia Y; Cho S; Greenway HT; Zelac DE; Kelley B Dermatol Surg; 2011 May; 37(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 21457390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterile versus nonsterile gloves during Mohs micrographic surgery: infection rate is not affected. Rhinehart MB; Murphy MM; Farley MF; Albertini JG Dermatol Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 16442035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective study of wound infections in Mohs micrographic surgery using clean surgical technique in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics. Rogers HD; Desciak EB; Marcus RP; Wang S; MacKay-Wiggan J; Eliezri YD J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):842-51. PubMed ID: 20800320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: Comparison of the prevalence of surgical site infection with use of sterile and nonsterile gloves for resection and reconstruction during Mohs surgery. Humphreys TR Dermatol Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):240. PubMed ID: 24589215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective Study of Wound Infections in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Using a Single Set of Instruments. Nasseri E Dermatol Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1008-12. PubMed ID: 26230327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. Alam M; Ibrahim O; Nodzenski M; Strasswimmer JM; Jiang SI; Cohen JL; Albano BJ; Batra P; Behshad R; Benedetto AV; Chan CS; Chilukuri S; Crocker C; Crystal HW; Dhir A; Faulconer VA; Goldberg LH; Goodman C; Greenbaum SS; Hale EK; Hanke CW; Hruza GJ; Jacobson L; Jones J; Kimyai-Asadi A; Kouba D; Lahti J; Macias K; Miller SJ; Monk E; Nguyen TH; Oganesyan G; Pennie M; Pontius K; Posten W; Reichel JL; Rohrer TE; Rooney JA; Tran HT; Poon E; Bolotin D; Dubina M; Pace N; Kim N; Disphanurat W; Kathawalla U; Kakar R; West DP; Veledar E; Yoo S JAMA Dermatol; 2013 Dec; 149(12):1378-85. PubMed ID: 24080866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Sterile vs Nonsterile Gloves in Cutaneous Surgery and Common Outpatient Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Brewer JD; Gonzalez AB; Baum CL; Arpey CJ; Roenigk RK; Otley CC; Erwin PJ JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Sep; 152(9):1008-14. PubMed ID: 27487033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of infection after Mohs micrographic and dermatologic surgery before and after implementation of new sterilization guidelines. Liu A; Lawrence N J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Jun; 70(6):1088-91. PubMed ID: 24680104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery is an important risk factor for postoperative surgical site infection: a prospective randomised study. Tai YJ; Borchard KL; Gunson TH; Smith HR; Vinciullo C Australas J Dermatol; 2013 May; 54(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 23425142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of surgical site infection rate among patients with Mohs micrographic surgery without the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Maragh SL; Brown MD J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 18638628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of infection rates during skin cancer excisions using nonsterile vs sterile gloves: A prospective randomized pilot study. Michener M; Xia Y; Larrymore D; McGraw T; McCarthy S J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Oct; 18(5):1475-1478. PubMed ID: 30661299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]