These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24447258)

  • 21. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.
    Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Full-Arch, Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Rehabilitations: Pilot Clinical Evaluation of Wear Against Natural or Composite Teeth.
    Cardelli P; Manobianco FP; Serafini N; Murmura G; Beuer F
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):629-633. PubMed ID: 26436677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
    Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Antagonist wear by polished zirconia crowns.
    Hartkamp O; Lohbauer U; Reich S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(3):263-274. PubMed ID: 28852744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures.
    Mitov G; Heintze SD; Walz S; Woll K; Muecklich F; Pospiech P
    Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 22608163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative Evaluation of Wear of Natural Enamel Antagonist Against Glazed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns and Polished Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: An In Vivo Study.
    Dondani JR; Pardeshi V; Gangurde A; Shaikh A; Mahule A; Deval P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023; 36(3):273–281. PubMed ID: 35998079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo study.
    Etman MK; Woolford M; Dunne S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 18548965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical performance and wear characteristics of veneered lithia-disilicate-based ceramic crowns.
    Suputtamongkol K; Anusavice KJ; Suchatlampong C; Sithiamnuai P; Tulapornchai C
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 17727943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Limited Evidence Supports Polished Monolithic Zirconia as Less Likely to Cause Antagonist Enamel Wear Compared to Other Prosthetic Materials.
    Alqutaibi AY
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2020 Mar; 20(1):101413. PubMed ID: 32381415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments.
    Preis V; Behr M; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jun; 10():13-22. PubMed ID: 22520415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A practice-based clinical evaluation of the survival and success of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 5-year results.
    Rinke S; Kramer K; Bürgers R; Roediger M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 43(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 26393865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three years in vivo wear: core-ceramic, veneers, and enamel antagonists.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Rose WF; Barrett AA; Oliveira ER; Yang MC; Clark AE; Anusavice KJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jun; 28(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 22410113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Practice-based clinical evaluation of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 3-year results.
    Rinke S; Schäfer S; Lange K; Gersdorff N; Roediger M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Mar; 40(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 23211063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear: A laboratory study.
    Chong BJ; Thangavel AK; Rolton SB; Guazzato M; Klineberg IJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():93-103. PubMed ID: 26116957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains.
    Kim MJ; Oh SH; Kim JH; Ju SW; Seo DG; Jun SH; Ahn JS; Ryu JJ
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):979-88. PubMed ID: 22892464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies.
    Aljomard YRM; Altunok EÇ; Kara HB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Apr; 34(3):473-489. PubMed ID: 34623015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enamel wear and aging of translucent zirconias: In vitro and clinical studies.
    Yang SW; Kim JE; Shin Y; Shim JS; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):417-425. PubMed ID: 30391060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of the wear of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia.
    Cha MS; Huh YH; Cho LR; Park CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 31653400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.