507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24447261)
1. Endoscopic resection yields reliable outcomes for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Jeon JH; Cheung DY; Lee SJ; Kim HJ; Kim HK; Cho HJ; Lee IK; Kim JI; Park SH; Kim JK
Dig Endosc; 2014 Jul; 26(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 24447261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; Choi CW; Kim SJ; Nam HS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(31):9387-93. PubMed ID: 26309365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection.
Lee DS; Jeon SW; Park SY; Jung MK; Cho CM; Tak WY; Kweon YO; Kim SK
Endoscopy; 2010 Aug; 42(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 20669076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Lee WH; Kim SW; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Lee IS; Choi MG; Choi KY
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4313-8. PubMed ID: 23807754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation.
Choi CW; Kang DH; Kim HW; Park SB; Jo WS; Song GA; Cho M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2013; 47(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 23188074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.
Park HW; Byeon JS; Park YS; Yang DH; Yoon SM; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 20381798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis.
Zhang HP; Wu W; Yang S; Lin J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1345-53. PubMed ID: 27367942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device or endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of 24 consecutive cases.
Niimi K; Goto O; Fujishiro M; Kodashima S; Ono S; Mochizuki S; Asada-Hirayama I; Konno-Shimizu M; Mikami-Matsuda R; Minatsuki C; Yamamichi N; Koike K
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 23078437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoloop ligation after endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap: A novel method to treat small rectal carcinoid tumors.
Zhang DG; Luo S; Xiong F; Xu ZL; Li YX; Yao J; Wang LS
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(10):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 30886508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm.
Jin R; Bai X; Xu T; Wu X; Wang Q; Li J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1028275. PubMed ID: 36704035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.
Cheung DY; Choi SK; Kim HK; Kim SS; Chae HS; Seo KJ; Cho YS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1500-5. PubMed ID: 25277474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas.
Barendse RM; van den Broek FJ; van Schooten J; Bemelman WA; Fockens P; de Graaf EJ; Dekker E;
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e191-6. PubMed ID: 22023493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term prognosis of an endoscopically treated rectal neuroendocrine tumor: 10-year experience in a single institution.
Sung HY; Kim SW; Kang WK; Kim SY; Jung CK; Cho YK; Park JM; Lee IS; Choi MG; Chung IS
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Aug; 24(8):978-83. PubMed ID: 22647741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Pan J; Zhang X; Shi Y; Pei Q
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 30193543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic resection therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou X; Xie H; Xie L; Li J; Cao W; Fu W
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 29(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24118068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A tailored approach for endoscopic treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumor.
Heo J; Jeon SW; Jung MK; Kim SK; Shin GY; Park SM; Ahn SY; Yoon WK; Kim M; Kwon YH
Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2931-8. PubMed ID: 24853847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos).
Yang DH; Park Y; Park SH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):1015-22; quiz 1023-.e6. PubMed ID: 26460225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for removing small rectal carcinoid tumor compared with endoscopic mucosal resection: analysis of 100 cases.
Kim HH; Park SJ; Lee SH; Park HU; Song CS; Park MI; Moon W
Dig Endosc; 2012 May; 24(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 22507089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zheng JC; Zheng K; Zhao S; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Jiang CG
Z Gastroenterol; 2020 Feb; 58(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 32050284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective and safe treatment for rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study.
Baek IH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 May; 20(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 20438309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
