226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24448705)
1. Comparison of cervical cytological screening results between postmenopausal and elderly women.
Cakmak B; Köseoğlu DR
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2014; 30(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 24448705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion category associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2?
Cetiner H; Kır G; Kaygusuz E; Sağlıcan Y; Kabaca C
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 24107612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical Pap screening among Israeli women, 2005-2010.
Bassal R; Schejter E; Bachar R; Shapira H; Sandbank J; Supino Rosin L; Schvimer M; Cohen D; Keinan-Boker L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Mar; 289(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 24085583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Verification of doubtful PAP smear results of women included in the screening program in the Podlaskie province].
Błońska E; Knapp PA
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):691-5. PubMed ID: 24191502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities.
Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.
Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N
Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening in Luxembourg.
Latsuzbaia A; Hebette G; Fischer M; Arbyn M; Weyers S; Vielh P; Schmitt F; Mossong J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 May; 45(5):384-390. PubMed ID: 28247516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atypical squamous cells: improvement in cytohistological correlation by the 2001 Bethesda System.
Karateke A; Gurbuz A; Kabaca C; Zati A; Mengulluoglu M; Kir G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 15493179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abnormal cervical cytology risk factors in the Western Black Sea Region and the importance of health insurance.
Sımavli S; Kaygusuz I; Cukur S; Aksel F
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2014; 30(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24101357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ström P; Ploner A; Elfström KM; Arnheim-Dahlström L; Dillner J; Sparén P
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i276. PubMed ID: 26869597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of cervical cancer screening results in women aged 50 and older in Beijing and Guizhou].
Guo GZ; Zhao Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 40(12):922-926. PubMed ID: 30605984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance pap smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Feng J; Al-Abbadi MA; Bandyopadhyay S; Salimnia H; Husain M
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 18702360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cytological screening and management in pregnant and postpartum women.
He GF; Bian ML; Wang Y; Liu XY
Chin Med Sci J; 2005 Dec; 20(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 16422252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervicovaginal smear abnormalities in sexually active adolescents. Implications for management.
Simsir A; Brooks S; Cochran L; Bourquin P; Ioffe OB
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 11917572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
