These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24449626)

  • 1. Comparision of pain levels of transradial versus transfemoral coronary catheterization: a prospective and randomized study.
    Aktürk E; Kurtoğlu E; Ermiş N; Açıkgöz N; Yağmur J; Altuntaş MS; Pekdemir H; Ozdemir R
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2014 Mar; 14(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 24449626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).
    Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.
    Tomassini F; Gagnor A; Montali N; Gambino A; Bollati M; Infantino V; Tizzani E; Varbella F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 23768506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
    Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.
    Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23453093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
    Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions.
    Koifman E; Gaglia MA; Escarcega RO; Bernardo NL; Lager RA; Gallino RA; Ben-Dor I; Pichard AD; Baker NC; Lipinski MJ; Kiramijyan S; Negi SI; Torguson R; Gai J; Suddath WO; Satler LF; Waksman R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):640-646. PubMed ID: 27860277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Access site-related complications after transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins.
    Honda T; Fujimoto K; Miyao Y; Koga H; Hirata Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 Sep; 27(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 22669817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction : A randomized prospective multicenter trial.
    Schernthaner C; Hammerer M; Harb S; Heigert M; Hoellinger K; Lassnig E; Maurer E; Schuler J; Siostrzonek P; Ulmer H; Winter A; Altenberger J
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2018 Mar; 130(5-6):182-189. PubMed ID: 28900715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
    Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).
    Pandie S; Mehta SR; Cantor WJ; Cheema AN; Gao P; Madan M; Niemela K; Rao SV; Schwalm JD; Valentin V; Velianou JL; Jolly SS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25907080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Piccolo R; Galasso G; Capuano E; De Luca S; Esposito G; Trimarco B; Piscione F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96127. PubMed ID: 24820096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese.
    Hibbert B; Simard T; Wilson KR; Hawken S; Wells GA; Ramirez FD; Le May MR; So DY; Glover CA; Froeschl M; Marquis JF; Labinaz M; Dick A; O'Brien ER
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(8):819-26. PubMed ID: 22917453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison.
    Bhat FA; Changal KH; Raina H; Tramboo NA; Rather HA
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28077091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Access Site Choice on Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Pancholy MS; Skelding K; Scott T; Blankenship J; Pancholy SB
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2141-2145. PubMed ID: 29100589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kadota K; Iwabuchi M; Shizuta S; Shiomi H; Kimura T
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 May; 27(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 22623001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.