These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24451614)
1. Psychometric properties of the 25-item Work Limitations Questionnaire in Japan: factor structure, validity, and reliability in information and communication technology company employees. Kono Y; Matsushima E; Uji M J Occup Environ Med; 2014 Feb; 56(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 24451614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Work Limitations Questionnaire in employees of multiple private companies]. Ida H; Nakagawa K; Tanoue A; Nakamura K; Okamura T Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2017 Jan; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 27829578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Work limitations among working persons with rheumatoid arthritis: results, reliability, and validity of the work limitations questionnaire in 836 patients. Walker N; Michaud K; Wolfe F J Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1006-12. PubMed ID: 15940759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Development of the Work Limitations Questionnaire Japanese version (WLQ-J): fundamental examination of the reliability and validity of the WLQ-J]. Ida H; Nakagawa K; Miura M; Ishikawa K; Yakura N Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2012; 54(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 22869201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Work performance assessed by a newly developed Japanese version of the Work Limitation Questionnaire in a general Japanese adult population. Takegami M; Yamazaki S; Greenhill A; Chang H; Fukuhara S J Occup Health; 2014; 56(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 24584219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and Reliability of the 8-Item Work Limitations Questionnaire. Walker TJ; Tullar JM; Diamond PM; Kohl HW; Amick BC J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 27(4):576-583. PubMed ID: 28025750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the work limitations questionnaire in patients with a chronic condition in the Netherlands. Verhoef JA; Miedema HS; Bramsen I; Roebroeck ME J Occup Environ Med; 2012 Oct; 54(10):1293-9. PubMed ID: 22995808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability and validity of the Caregiver Work Limitations Questionnaire. Lerner D; Parsons SK; Chang H; Visco ZL; Pawlecki JB J Occup Environ Med; 2015 Jan; 57(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 25397642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric Properties of the Work Well Index: A Short Questionnaire for Work-Related Stress. Mauss D; Li J; Angerer P Stress Health; 2017 Feb; 33(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 26916080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL). Reininga IH; Brouwer S; Dijkstra A; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Wendt KW; El Moumni M Injury; 2015 Feb; 46(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 25441575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Severity of anxiety and work-related outcomes of patients with anxiety disorders. Erickson SR; Guthrie S; Vanetten-Lee M; Himle J; Hoffman J; Santos SF; Janeck AS; Zivin K; Abelson JL Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(12):1165-71. PubMed ID: 19842165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Swedish Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire (DCSQ): factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency in a large population. Sanne B; Torp S; Mykletun A; Dahl AA Scand J Public Health; 2005; 33(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 16040456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire. La Touche R; Pardo-Montero J; Gil-Martínez A; Paris-Alemany A; Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S; Suárez-Falcón JC; Lara-Lara M; Fernández-Carnero J Pain Physician; 2014; 17(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 24452650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Age-job satisfaction relationship for Japanese public school teachers: a comparison of teachers' labor union members and professional and technical employee members of private company labor unions]. Takahara R Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2014; 56(4):91-101. PubMed ID: 24930495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Work Limitations Questionnaire in Brazilian Army military personnel. Umann J; Marques da Silva R; Akiko Kimura C; Cauê Lopes V; Bellezi Guilhem D Invest Educ Enferm; 2018 Sep; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 31083852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Matsudaira K; Kikuchi N; Murakami A; Isomura T J Orthop Sci; 2014 Jan; 19(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24091984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the 22-item and 45-item Karasek job content questionnaire. Phakthongsuk P; Apakupakul N Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2008; 21(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 19228579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the Japanese translated version of the Swedish Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire. Mase J; Ota A; Inoue K; Iida T; Tsutsumi A; Yatsuya H; Ono Y Ind Health; 2012; 50(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 23047080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Mentoring Functions Questionnaire 9-item version]. Sakakibara KS; Ishikawa H; Kiuchi T Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2013; 55(4):125-34. PubMed ID: 23676526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric properties of scales in the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS): confirmatory factor analysis and prediction of certified long-term sickness absence. Wännström I; Peterson U; Asberg M; Nygren A; Gustavsson JP Scand J Psychol; 2009 Jun; 50(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 19037910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]