These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24451859)

  • 1. Integrity of implant surface modifications after insertion.
    Mints D; Elias C; Funkenbusch P; Meirelles L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 24451859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does implant surface hydrophilicity influence the maintenance of surface integrity after insertion into low-density artificial bone?
    Silva GAF; Faot F; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA
    Dent Mater; 2021 Feb; 37(2):e69-e84. PubMed ID: 33234316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the surface damage of dental implants caused by different surgical protocols: an in vitro study.
    Streckbein P; Wilbrand JF; Kähling C; Pons-Kühnemann J; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B; Howaldt HP; Möhlhenrich SC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 48(7):971-981. PubMed ID: 30692029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone.
    Silva GAF; Faot F; Possebon APDR; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104515. PubMed ID: 33932754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
    Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
    Park JW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model.
    Fabbro MD; Taschieri S; Canciani E; Addis A; Musto F; Weinstein R; Dellavia C
    Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 28234707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants.
    Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface Damage on Dental Implants with Release of Loose Particles after Insertion into Bone.
    Senna P; Antoninha Del Bel Cury A; Kates S; Meirelles L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):681-92. PubMed ID: 24283455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osteogenesis and morphology of the peri-implant bone facing dental implants.
    Franchi M; Orsini E; Trire A; Quaranta M; Martini D; Piccari GG; Ruggeri A; Ottani V
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2004 Dec; 4():1083-95. PubMed ID: 15632988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different surface modifications for titanium implants installed into the goat iliac crest.
    van Oirschot BA; Meijer GJ; Bronkhorst EM; Närhi T; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e57-67. PubMed ID: 25486997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides.
    Sul YT; Johansson CB; Jeong Y; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Jun; 13(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 12010155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Importance of Ca(2+) modifications for osseointegration of smooth and moderately rough anodized titanium implants - a removal torque and histological evaluation in rabbit.
    Fröjd V; Wennerberg A; Franke Stenport V
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 20977616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between the size of released titanium particles and changes in the surface of dental implants during insertion into bone blocks: an
    Kheder W; Samsudin AR; Sheela S; Al Kawas S
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38725428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.
    Juodzbalys G; Sapragoniene M; Wennerberg A; Baltrukonis T
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 17912958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
    Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits.
    Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants.
    Elias CN; Rocha FA; Nascimento AL; Coelho PG
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():169-80. PubMed ID: 23182386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.