These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24452160)

  • 1. Real-time cellular analysis coupled with a specimen enrichment accurately detects and quantifies Clostridium difficile toxins in stool.
    Huang B; Jin D; Zhang J; Sun JY; Wang X; Stiles J; Xu X; Kamboj M; Babady NE; Tang YW
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 52(4):1105-11. PubMed ID: 24452160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Clostridium difficile infections by quantitative detection of tcdB toxin by use of a real-time cell analysis system.
    Ryder AB; Huang Y; Li H; Zheng M; Wang X; Stratton CW; Xu X; Tang YW
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 48(11):4129-34. PubMed ID: 20720023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.
    Boyanton BL; Sural P; Loomis CR; Pesta C; Gonzalez-Krellwitz L; Robinson-Dunn B; Riska P
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 50(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 22189114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.
    Hirvonen JJ; Mentula S; Kaukoranta SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):2908-12. PubMed ID: 23804386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel one-step method for detection and isolation of active-toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains directly from stool samples.
    Darkoh C; Dupont HL; Kaplan HB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Dec; 49(12):4219-24. PubMed ID: 21976761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of
    Senok AC; Aldosari KM; Alowaisheq RA; Abid OA; Alsuhaibani KA; Khan MA; Somily AM
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2017; 23(4):259-262. PubMed ID: 28721981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of rectal swabs and fecal samples for the detection of
    Huletsky A; Loo VG; Longtin Y; Longtin J; Trottier S; Tremblay CL; Gilca R; Lavallée C; Brochu É; Bérubé È; Bastien M; Bernier M; Gagnon M; Frenette J; Bestman-Smith J; Deschênes L; Bergeron MG
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0022524. PubMed ID: 38687067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
    Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture.
    Jensen MB; Olsen KE; Nielsen XC; Hoegh AM; Dessau RB; Atlung T; Engberg J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Apr; 34(4):727-36. PubMed ID: 25421216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples.
    Peterson LR; Young SA; Davis TE; Wang ZX; Duncan J; Noutsios C; Liesenfeld O; Osiecki JC; Lewinski MA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 55(12):3426-3436. PubMed ID: 28954901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.
    Carroll KC; Buchan BW; Tan S; Stamper PD; Riebe KM; Pancholi P; Kelly C; Rao A; Fader R; Cavagnolo R; Watson W; Goering RV; Trevino EA; Weissfeld AS; Ledeboer NA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Dec; 51(12):4120-5. PubMed ID: 24088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Stool.
    Song L; Zhao M; Duffy DC; Hansen J; Shields K; Wungjiranirun M; Chen X; Xu H; Leffler DA; Sambol SP; Gerding DN; Kelly CP; Pollock NR
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 53(10):3204-12. PubMed ID: 26202120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of fecal Clostridium difficile load in discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR: is quantitation the next step in C. difficile testing?
    Leslie JL; Cohen SH; Solnick JV; Polage CR
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Dec; 31(12):3295-9. PubMed ID: 22814877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prognostic value of toxin B and binary toxin in
    López-Cárdenas S; Torres-Martos E; Mora-Delgado J; Sánchez-Calvo JM; Santos-Peña M; Zapata López Á; Dolores López-Prieto M; Pérez-Cortés S; Carlos Alados J
    Gut Microbes; 2021; 13(1):1884516. PubMed ID: 33660568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Evaluation of the Performance of C. Diff Quik Chek Complete and Toxin A + B (Clostridium difficile) DUO Diagnostic Tests Compared with Toxigenic Culture in the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection.
    Yazisiz H; Özyurt ÖK; Öngüt G; Baysan BÖ; Dönmez L; Günseren F; Çolak D; Öğünç D
    Clin Lab; 2020 Apr; 66(4):. PubMed ID: 32255305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
    Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of C. difficile toxin as a model assay for performing fully automated high-throughput RT-PCR on clinical stool samples.
    Eigner U; Nörz D; Reucher S; Furrer J; Sun J; Chu K; Kolb M; Hefner N; Pfefferle S; Lütgehetmann M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 May; 172():105882. PubMed ID: 32119956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Shin BM; Kuak EY; Lee EJ; Songer JG
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2952-6. PubMed ID: 19625481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays.
    Pancholi P; Kelly C; Raczkowski M; Balada-Llasat JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Apr; 50(4):1331-5. PubMed ID: 22278839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cost-effective approach for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: toxigenic culture using ChromID Clostridium difficile agar.
    Luk S; To WK; Ng TK; Hui WT; Lee WK; Lau F; Ching AM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Feb; 52(2):671-3. PubMed ID: 24478510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.