These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24452935)
1. Corneal biomechanical characteristics in children with diabetes mellitus. Nalcacioglu-Yuksekkaya P; Sen E; Cetinkaya S; Bas V; Aycan Z; Ozturk F Int Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 34(4):881-6. PubMed ID: 24452935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes]. Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of sex differences in corneal hysteresis. Allam RS; Khalil NM Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 25684160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements. Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters. Hwang HS; Park SK; Kim MS BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 13():49. PubMed ID: 24083664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Central Corneal Thickness in Glaucoma Patients, Glaucoma Suspects, and a Healthy Population. Del Buey-Sayas MÁ; Lanchares-Sancho E; Campins-Falcó P; Pinazo-Durán MD; Peris-Martínez C J Clin Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34203884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of topical corneal anaesthesia on ocular response analyzer parameters: pilot study. Ehongo A; De Maertelaer V; Pourjavan S Int Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 29(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 18545939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang X; Xu G; Wang W; Wang J; Chen L; He M; Chen Z Acta Diabetol; 2020 Aug; 57(8):973-981. PubMed ID: 32201905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty on corneal biomechanics. Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 94(6):e501-4. PubMed ID: 26749244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Higher Intraocular Pressure Levels Associated With Lower Hysteresis In Type 2 Diabetes. Bekmez S; Kocaturk T Open Ophthalmol J; 2018; 12():29-33. PubMed ID: 29643950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal biochemical features of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Emre S; Başer E; Oztürk B; Zorlu S; Uzun O; Gülhan C Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):555-8. PubMed ID: 22722471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal biomechanics in different age groups. El Massry AAK; Said AA; Osman IM; Bessa AS; Elmasry MA; Elsayed EN; Bayoumi NHL Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):967-974. PubMed ID: 31916064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Pterygium on Corneal Biomechanical Properties. Öner V; Taş M; Özkaya E; Bulut A Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):913-6. PubMed ID: 26473282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]