These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2445315)

  • 1. A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology.
    Kruger TF; Ackerman SB; Simmons KF; Swanson RJ; Brugo SS; Acosta AA
    Arch Androl; 1987; 18(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 2445315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two staining and evaluation methods used for computerized human sperm morphology evaluations.
    Coetzee K; Kruger TF; Vandendael A; de Villiers A; Lombard CJ
    Andrologia; 1997; 29(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 9197916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of human sperm morphology by strict criteria: comparison of wet preparation versus stained with the modified Diff-Quik method.
    Oral E; Yetis O; Elibol F; Senol H; Irez T; Aksu FM
    Arch Androl; 2002; 48(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12137592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different staining and washing procedures on the results of human sperm morphology evaluation by manual and computerised methods.
    Menkveld R; Lacquet FA; Kruger TF; Lombard CJ; Sanchez Sarmiento CA; de Villiers A
    Andrologia; 1997; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9049005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Studies on human spermatozoal acrosome using spermac stain in fertile and infertile men including two cases of round-headed spermatozoa].
    Satoh K; Satoh S; Maehara I; Orikasa S
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 80(4):562-8. PubMed ID: 2473239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of papanicolaou staining for sperm morphologic analysis: comparison with an automated sperm quality analyzer.
    Singh S; Sharma S; Jain M; Chauhan R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Aug; 136(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 21757597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of six kinds of sperm staining methods on human sperm size and evaluation of their staining effects.
    Xu YH; Lu JC; Tang SS
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2022 Dec; 36(12):e24794. PubMed ID: 36441612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scoring human sperm morphology using Testsimplets and Diff-Quik slides.
    Natali I; Muratori M; Sarli V; Vannuccini M; Cipriani S; Niccoli L; Giachini C
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Apr; 99(5):1227-1232.e2. PubMed ID: 23375198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.
    Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa.
    Henkel R; Schreiber G; Sturmhoefel A; Hipler UC; Zermann DH; Menkveld R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 17601601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer.
    Hidalgo M; Rodríguez I; Dorado J
    Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16620924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of staining method and clinician experience on the evaluation of stallion sperm morphology.
    Murcia-Robayo RY; Jouanisson E; Beauchamp G; Diaw M
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2018 Jan; 188():165-169. PubMed ID: 29198956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SpermBlue: a new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis.
    van der Horst G; Maree L
    Biotech Histochem; 2009 Dec; 84(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 19488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and male fertility under in-vivo conditions of conception.
    Eggert-Kruse W; Schwarz H; Rohr G; Demirakca T; Tilgen W; Runnebaum B
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Jan; 11(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 8671176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the acrosome in oligozoospermic patients by simplified triple stain technique.
    Sánchez R; Fehl P; Miska W
    Andrologia; 1995; 27(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 8659702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff-Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization.
    Tavares RS; Silva AF; Lourenço B; Almeida-Santos T; Sousa AP; Ramalho-Santos J
    Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 24124136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of sperm morphology with three different staining procedures.
    Calamera JC; Vilar O
    Andrologia; 1979; 11(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 91334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of normal sperm morphology outcomes from two different computer-assisted semen analysis systems.
    Coetzee K; Bermes N; Krause W; Menkveld R
    Andrologia; 2001 May; 33(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11380331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive value of sperm chromatin condensation (aniline blue staining) in the assessment of male fertility.
    Hammadeh ME; Zeginiadov T; Rosenbaum P; Georg T; Schmidt W; Strehler E
    Arch Androl; 2001; 46(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11297072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human sperm morphology evaluation pre- and post-Percoll gradient centrifugation.
    Hall JA; Fishel SB; Timson JA; Dowell K; Klentzeris LD
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Feb; 10(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 7769059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.