These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24453450)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study.
    Yarapatineni R; Vilekar A; Kumar JP; Kumar GA; Aravind P; Kumar PA
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Dec; 5(6):82-7. PubMed ID: 24453450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of border molding using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches: A clinical study.
    Qanungo A; Aras MA; Chitre V; Coutinho I; Rajagopal P; Mysore A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(4):340-345. PubMed ID: 27746597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation and Comparison of the Effect of Different Border Molding Materials on Complete Denture Retention: An in vivo Study.
    Pachar RB; Singla Y; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):982-987. PubMed ID: 30150501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo evaluation of the impact of various border molding materials and techniques on the retention of complete maxillary dentures.
    Jassim TK; Kareem AE; Alloaibi MA
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 32649808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of the retention of maxillary denture base with and without border molding using zinc oxide eugenol impression paste.
    Kaur S; Datta K; Gupta SK; Suman N
    Indian J Dent; 2016; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 27134447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory investigation of Accuracy of Impression Materials for Border Molding.
    Shopova D; Slavchev D
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Sep; 61(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 32337931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study.
    Arora AK; Goyal I; Sehgal M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 26929495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single Stage Silicone Border Molded Closed Mouth Impression Technique-Part II.
    Solomon EG
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2011 Sep; 11(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 22942578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Establishment and preliminary clinical evaluation of edentulous custom trays designed and fabricated by chair-side CAD and 3D printing systems].
    Wang KP; Ye HQ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhou YS
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Apr; 51(2):349-355. PubMed ID: 30996381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complete Denture - Border Molding Technique Using a Laboratory Condensation Silicone Putty: Review.
    Melo Neto CLM; Dos Santos DM; Goiato MC
    Prague Med Rep; 2023; 124(4):359-379. PubMed ID: 38069643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative analysis of the selective pressure impression technique using CAD-CAM technology: A pilot clinical study.
    Stein BE; Yoon HI; Mattie H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 33992466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104279. PubMed ID: 36070825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Negative Pressure Measurement after Border Molding Procedure.
    Shopova DA; Slavchev D
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Sep; 62(3):578-584. PubMed ID: 33009756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Final-impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures.
    Jayaraman S; Singh BP; Ramanathan B; Pazhaniappan Pillai M; MacDonald L; Kirubakaran R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 4(4):CD012256. PubMed ID: 29617037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative clinical trial for evaluating the posterior palatal seal developed from the conventional method and a novel functional swallow method.
    Mishra S; Krishna R; Mandokar RB; Agarwal S; Sharma A; Shaw M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 36510944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An
    Goel M; Dhawan P; Tandan P; Madhukar P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(3):271-276. PubMed ID: 30111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-step border molding of complete denture impressions using a polyether impression material.
    Smith DE; Toolson LB; Bolender CL; Lord JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Mar; 41(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 368323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In silico evaluation of the peripheral and inner seals in complete denture master impressions using a custom-developed 3D software.
    Kalberer N; Chebib N; Wachter W; Lee H; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 32488486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
    Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.