These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24453450)

  • 21. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is a two-step impression mandatory for complete denture fabrication on the severely resorbed mandible? A randomized trial on patient perception and denture quality.
    Albuquerque IS; Regis RR; de Souza RF; Gurgel KF; Silva PG; Pinto-Fiamengui LMS; Freitas-Pontes KM
    J Dent; 2020 Jul; 98():103356. PubMed ID: 32380132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A modified technique for single-step border molding.
    Pawar RS; Kulkarni RS; Raipure PE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):654-657. PubMed ID: 30017163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complete denture impressioning technique.
    Kois JC; Fan PP
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Jul; 18(7):699-704, 706-8; quiz 710. PubMed ID: 9533331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study.
    Chebib N; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Maniewicz S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 36055812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States.
    Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Various Spacer Thickness for Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty-wash Impression Techniques: An
    Gautam N; Ahmed R; Sharma S; Madineni PK; Hasan S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 33623344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.
    Sun Y; Chen H; Li H; Deng K; Zhao T; Wang Y; Zhou Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14958. PubMed ID: 29097699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A technique for border molding edentulous impressions using vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Chaffee NR; Cooper LF; Felton DA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Jun; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 10740512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A New Fast and Simple Border Molding Process for Complete Dentures Using a Compound Stick Gun.
    Park C; Yang HS; Lim HP; Yun KD; Oh GJ; Park SW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(6):559-560. PubMed ID: 27824973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masticatory performance of different impression methods for complete denture fabrication: A randomized controlled trial.
    Komagamine Y; Kanazawa M; Sato Y; Iwaki M; Jo A; Minakuchi S
    J Dent; 2019 Apr; 83():7-11. PubMed ID: 30711603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is a two-step impression mandatory for complete denture fabrication on the severely resorbed mandible? A randomized trial on mastication, patient satisfaction and adjustments.
    Albuquerque IS; Freitas-Pontes KM; de Souza RF; Negreiros WA; Ramos MB; Peixoto RF; Regis RR
    J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103357. PubMed ID: 32437857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized controlled trial of the different impression methods for the complete denture fabrication: Patient reported outcomes.
    Jo A; Kanazawa M; Sato Y; Iwaki M; Akiba N; Minakuchi S
    J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):989-96. PubMed ID: 26051546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Custom double tray for a special impression technique for flabby maxillary residual ridge: Case report.
    Mostafa AZH; Alanazi SM; Almarshedy SM
    Clin Case Rep; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e05593. PubMed ID: 35340660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.