These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24454529)

  • 1. Validation study methods for estimating odds ratio in 2 × 2 × J tables when exposure is misclassified.
    Nouri B; Zare N; Ayatollahi SM
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():170120. PubMed ID: 24454529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matrix methods for estimating odds ratios with misclassified exposure data: extensions and comparisons.
    Morrissey MJ; Spiegelman D
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 11318185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining internal and external validation data to correct for exposure misclassification: a case study.
    Lyles RH; Zhang F; Drews-Botsch C
    Epidemiology; 2007 May; 18(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 17435440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification in case-control studies.
    Chu R; Gustafson P; Le N
    Stat Med; 2010 Apr; 29(9):994-1003. PubMed ID: 20087839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of exposure misclassification bias in case-control studies using validation data.
    Marshall RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Jan; 50(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9048686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting for exposure misclassification using an alloyed gold standard.
    Brenner H
    Epidemiology; 1996 Jul; 7(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 8793367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patterns of bias due to differential misclassification by case-control status in a case-control study.
    Chyou PH
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2007; 22(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 17225958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Curious phenomena in Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification.
    Gustafson P; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 16220473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A note on estimating crude odds ratios in case-control studies with differentially misclassified exposure.
    Lyles RH
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1034-6; discussion 1036-7. PubMed ID: 12495160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting.
    Lyles RH; Lin J
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(22):2297-309. PubMed ID: 20552681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binary regression with differentially misclassified response and exposure variables.
    Tang L; Lyles RH; King CC; Celentano DD; Lo Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(9):1605-20. PubMed ID: 25652841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted estimation for confounded binary outcomes subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):425-436. PubMed ID: 29082530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of validation studies for estimating the odds ratio of exposure-disease relationships when exposure is misclassified.
    Holcroft CA; Spiegelman D
    Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1193-201. PubMed ID: 11315067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of odds ratios with multiple levels of exposure.
    Birkett NJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 136(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 1415154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can efficiency be gained by correcting for misclassification?
    Wang M; Liao X; Spiegelman D
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2013 Nov; 143(11):. PubMed ID: 24187429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation data-based adjustments for outcome misclassification in logistic regression: an illustration.
    Lyles RH; Tang L; Superak HM; King CC; Celentano DD; Lo Y; Sobel JD
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jul; 22(4):589-97. PubMed ID: 21487295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditional validation sampling for consistent risk estimation with binary outcome data subject to misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Farrell PJ; Krewski D
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):227-233. PubMed ID: 30746841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of attributable risk.
    Vogel C; Gefeller O
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 12425247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple Bayesian analysis of misclassified binary data with a validation substudy.
    Prescott GJ; Garthwaite PH
    Biometrics; 2002 Jun; 58(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 12071421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended Matrix and Inverse Matrix Methods Utilizing Internal Validation Data When Both Disease and Exposure Status Are Misclassified.
    Tang L; Lyles RH; Ye Y; Lo Y; King CC
    Epidemiol Methods; 2013 Sep; 2(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 25844304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.