These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24454995)

  • 1. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.
    Sullivan GM; Artino AR
    J Grad Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 5(4):541-2. PubMed ID: 24454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing a Method for Intervals Correction on Multiple Likert Scales: A Case Study on an Urban Soundscape Data Collection Instrument.
    Lionello M; Aletta F; Mitchell A; Kang J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():602831. PubMed ID: 33551915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the reliability and validity of Likert-type scales for people with intellectual disability.
    Hartley SL; MacLean WE
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Nov; 50(Pt 11):813-27. PubMed ID: 16999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyzing a German-language Expanded Form of the PhoPhiKat-45: Psychometric Properties, Factorial Structure, Measurement Invariance with the Likert-Version, and Self-Peer Convergence.
    Brauer K; Proyer RT
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 32057257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert-type scales in Internet-based personality questionnaires.
    Kuhlmann T; Dantlgraber M; Reips UD
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2173-2181. PubMed ID: 28130728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is a line the same as a box? Speech assessment by VAS is not superior to Likert scales in laryngeal cancer patients.
    Johansson M; Finizia C; Innocenti AD; Ryden A
    Med Sci Monit; 2007 Nov; 13(11):CR481-487. PubMed ID: 17968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use and Misuse of the Likert Item Responses and Other Ordinal Measures.
    Bishop PA; Herron RL
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2015; 8(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 27182418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix Validity of Likert Scales Via Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Flamer S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1983 Jul; 18(3):275-306. PubMed ID: 26744917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing Interpreting Competence Scales in China.
    Wang W; Xu Y; Wang B; Mu L
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():481. PubMed ID: 32395112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying and analyzing likert scales.
    Castleberry A; Peeters MJ
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37620207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the affective domain. Consider a Likert scale.
    Bucher L
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1991; 7(5):234-8. PubMed ID: 1919757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of Factorial Validity of Parental Knowledge, Control and Solicitation, and Adolescent Disclosure Scales: When the Ordered Nature of Likert Scales Matters.
    Lionetti F; Keijsers L; Dellagiulia A; Pastore M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():941. PubMed ID: 27445909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency.
    Douven I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1203-1211. PubMed ID: 28752379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the Importance of Treatment Goals in Patients with Psoriasis: Analytic Hierarchy Process vs. Likert Scales.
    Gutknecht M; Danner M; Schaarschmidt ML; Gross C; Augustin M
    Patient; 2018 Aug; 11(4):425-437. PubMed ID: 29450833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response relationship of VAS and Likert scales in osteoarthritis efficacy measurement.
    Bolognese JA; Schnitzer TJ; Ehrich EW
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2003 Jul; 11(7):499-507. PubMed ID: 12814613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likert is Pronounced "LICK-urt" not "LIE-kurt" and the Data are Ordinal not Interval.
    Kero P; Lee D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):502-509. PubMed ID: 28009595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.
    Park M; Wu AD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):911-930. PubMed ID: 31488919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement.
    Sung YT; Wu JS
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1694-1715. PubMed ID: 29667082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of an ordinal and a continuous outcome measure of muscle soreness.
    Vickers AJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(4):709-16. PubMed ID: 10645112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.