These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24455069)

  • 1. Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study.
    Singh R; Singh J; Gambhir RS; Singh R; Nanda S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2013 Jul; 5(3):e138-43. PubMed ID: 24455069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of material waste, dimensional stability, and detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials mixed with different mixing tips.
    Maluly-Proni AT; Delben JA; Briso ALF; Marson FC; Dos Santos PH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):759-764. PubMed ID: 33454110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Reproduction and Dimensional Stability of Poly Ether, Vinyl Siloxane, and Vinyl Siloxane Ether Impression Materials: An
    Rose S; Aravindakshan S; Mohamed Usman JA; Mohamed R; Menon S; Shafiullah RS; Salloum MG
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S851-S856. PubMed ID: 34447214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and gypsum compatibility of monophase polyvinyl-siloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials under dry and moist conditions.
    Vadapalli SB; Atluri K; Putcha MS; Kondreddi S; Kumar NS; Tadi DP
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016; 6(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 27583217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
    Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
    Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
    Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
    Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
    de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Detail Reproduction of Four Hydrophilic Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Materials Tested Under Dry, Moist, and Wet Conditions-An In Vitro Study.
    Nagrath R; Lahori M; Agrawal M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Dec; 14(Suppl 1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26199493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.