136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24455541)
1. Dose prediction accuracy of anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm beyond high density heterogeneity interface.
Rana SB
South Asian J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 2(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 24455541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SU-E-T-529: Dosimetric Evaluation with Heterogeneity in Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation Algorithm and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA).
Rana S; Rogers K
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3827. PubMed ID: 28518491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification of dose calculation algorithms in a multi-layer heterogeneous phantom using films.
Rana S; Pokharel S
Gulf J Oncolog; 2013 Jul; 1(14):63-9. PubMed ID: 23996869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of the pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in predicting the dose effects due to attenuation from immobilization devices and large air gaps.
Gray A; Oliver LD; Johnston PN
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3181-91. PubMed ID: 19673217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of dose calculations by anisotropic analytical algorithms for stereotactic radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Kan MW; Cheung JY; Leung LH; Lau BM; Yu PK
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 56(2):397-413. PubMed ID: 21178236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric evaluation of the Acuros XB algorithm for a 4 MV photon beam in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Hirata K; Nakamura M; Yoshimura M; Mukumoto N; Nakata M; Ito H; Inokuchi H; Matsuo Y; Mizowaki T; Hiraoka M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):52–64. PubMed ID: 26218997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm with measurements in predicting doses beyond different air gap thickness for smaller and larger field sizes.
Rana S; Rogers K
J Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 38(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 23532180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D conformal breast radiation treatment plans using the anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Yoo S; Wu Q; O'Daniel J; Horton J; Yin FF
Radiother Oncol; 2012 May; 103(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22349127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in stereotactic lung irradiation.
Herman Tde L; Hibbitts K; Herman T; Ahmad S
J Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 36(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 22228933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Gagné IM; Zavgorodni S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 8(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 17592451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.
Oinam AS; Singh L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 11(4):3351. PubMed ID: 21081894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator.
Sterpin E; Tomsej M; De Smedt B; Reynaert N; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1665-77. PubMed ID: 17555248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytical anisotropic algorithm versus pencil beam convolution for treatment planning of breast cancer: implications for target coverage and radiation burden of normal tissue.
Flejmer AM; Dohlmar F; Nilsson M; Stenmarker M; Dasu A
Anticancer Res; 2015 May; 35(5):2841-8. PubMed ID: 25964565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.
Caprile PF; Venencia CD; Besa P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17592453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.
Yan C; Combine AG; Bednarz G; Lalonde RJ; Hu B; Dickens K; Wynn R; Pavord DC; Saiful Huq M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):195-209. PubMed ID: 28834214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
