These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24456628)

  • 1. An experimental framework for improved selection of binding proteins using SNAP display.
    Houlihan G; Gatti-Lafranconi P; Kaltenbach M; Lowe D; Hollfelder F
    J Immunol Methods; 2014 Mar; 405():47-56. PubMed ID: 24456628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SNAP dendrimers: multivalent protein display on dendrimer-like DNA for directed evolution.
    Kaltenbach M; Stein V; Hollfelder F
    Chembiochem; 2011 Sep; 12(14):2208-16. PubMed ID: 21780273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Directed evolution of anti-HER2 DARPins by SNAP display reveals stability/function trade-offs in the selection process.
    Houlihan G; Gatti-Lafranconi P; Lowe D; Hollfelder F
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2015 Sep; 28(9):269-79. PubMed ID: 26134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of single domain binding proteins by covalent DNA display.
    Bertschinger J; Grabulovski D; Neri D
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2007 Feb; 20(2):57-68. PubMed ID: 17242027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid selection of specific MAP kinase-binders from designed ankyrin repeat protein libraries.
    Amstutz P; Koch H; Binz HK; Deuber SA; Plückthun A
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 May; 19(5):219-29. PubMed ID: 16551653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid selection of high-affinity binders using ribosome display.
    Dreier B; Plückthun A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 805():261-86. PubMed ID: 22094811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SNAP display - an in vitro method for the selection of protein binders.
    Houlihan G; Lowe D; Hollfelder F
    Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(30):5421-8. PubMed ID: 23431984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient selection of DARPins with sub-nanomolar affinities using SRP phage display.
    Steiner D; Forrer P; Plückthun A
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Oct; 382(5):1211-27. PubMed ID: 18706916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ribosome display: selecting and evolving proteins in vitro that specifically bind to a target.
    Zahnd C; Amstutz P; Plückthun A
    Nat Methods; 2007 Mar; 4(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 17327848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DARPins recognizing the tumor-associated antigen EpCAM selected by phage and ribosome display and engineered for multivalency.
    Stefan N; Martin-Killias P; Wyss-Stoeckle S; Honegger A; Zangemeister-Wittke U; Plückthun A
    J Mol Biol; 2011 Nov; 413(4):826-43. PubMed ID: 21963989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A designed ankyrin repeat protein evolved to picomolar affinity to Her2.
    Zahnd C; Wyler E; Schwenk JM; Steiner D; Lawrence MC; McKern NM; Pecorari F; Ward CW; Joos TO; Plückthun A
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jun; 369(4):1015-28. PubMed ID: 17466328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From DARPins to LoopDARPins: novel LoopDARPin design allows the selection of low picomolar binders in a single round of ribosome display.
    Schilling J; Schöppe J; Plückthun A
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Feb; 426(3):691-721. PubMed ID: 24513107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covalent DNA display as a novel tool for directed evolution of proteins in vitro.
    Bertschinger J; Neri D
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Sep; 17(9):699-707. PubMed ID: 15522920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Highly efficient ribosome display selection by use of purified components for in vitro translation.
    Villemagne D; Jackson R; Douthwaite JA
    J Immunol Methods; 2006 Jun; 313(1-2):140-8. PubMed ID: 16730021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SNAP display: in vitro protein evolution in microdroplets.
    Kaltenbach M; Hollfelder F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 805():101-11. PubMed ID: 22094803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ribosome display: a technology for selecting and evolving proteins from large libraries.
    Dreier B; Plückthun A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 687():283-306. PubMed ID: 20967617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitored whole gene in vitro evolution of an anti-hRaf-1 affibody molecule towards increased binding affinity.
    Grimm S; Salahshour S; Nygren PÅ
    N Biotechnol; 2012 Jun; 29(5):534-42. PubMed ID: 22027369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of protein stability using ribosome display.
    Buchanan A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 805():191-212. PubMed ID: 22094807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational analysis of off-rate selection experiments to optimize affinity maturation by directed evolution.
    Zahnd C; Sarkar CA; Plückthun A
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 Apr; 23(4):175-84. PubMed ID: 20130104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ribosome display: a perspective.
    Plückthun A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 805():3-28. PubMed ID: 22094797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.