These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24457258)

  • 41. Approaches to the study of haptic sensing.
    Henriques DY; Soechting JF
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3036-43. PubMed ID: 15911888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Touch Precision Modulates Visual Bias.
    Misceo GF; Jones MD
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(3):307-311. PubMed ID: 28850323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Processing load impairs coordinate integration for the localization of touch.
    Badde S; Heed T; Röder B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1136-50. PubMed ID: 24550040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.
    Zahariev MA; Mackenzie CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 18214451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An elasticity-curvature illusion decouples cutaneous and proprioceptive cues in active exploration of soft objects.
    Xu C; Wang Y; Gerling GJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Mar; 17(3):e1008848. PubMed ID: 33750948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Differences in spatial acuity between digits.
    Vega-Bermudez F; Johnson KO
    Neurology; 2001 May; 56(10):1389-91. PubMed ID: 11376194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multiplicative-cascade dynamics supports whole-body coordination for perception via effortful touch.
    Mangalam M; Kelty-Stephen DG
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Apr; 70():102595. PubMed ID: 32217213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception.
    Suzuishi Y; Hidaka S; Kuroki S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13929. PubMed ID: 32811859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Changing the influence of the egocentric reference frame impacts deviations in haptic parallelity matching.
    Van Mier HI
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2387-2395. PubMed ID: 31292694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.
    Gallace A; Soto-Faraco S; Dalton P; Kreukniet B; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 191(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 18709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of using multiple hands and fingers on haptic performance.
    Morash VS; Pensky AE; Miele JA
    Perception; 2013; 42(7):759-77. PubMed ID: 24344552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
    Park GD; Reed CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2977-88. PubMed ID: 26126805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Egocentric/allocentric and coordinate/categorical haptic encoding in blind people.
    Ruggiero G; Ruotolo F; Iachini T
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S313-7. PubMed ID: 22806679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching.
    Zopf R; Truong S; Finkbeiner M; Friedman J; Williams MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1287-1293. PubMed ID: 21320514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The haptic reproduction of orientations in three-dimensional space.
    Baud-Bovy G; Gentaz E
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 172(3):283-300. PubMed ID: 16468026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Flexibly weighted integration of tactile reference frames.
    Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():367-74. PubMed ID: 25447059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces.
    Sahli R; Prot A; Wang A; Müser MH; Piovarči M; Didyk P; Bennewitz R
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15800. PubMed ID: 32978470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.
    Gaissert N; Wallraven C
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 22048319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cross-sensory transfer of reference frames in spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Avraamides MN
    Cognition; 2011 Mar; 118(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 21227408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Target contact and exploration strategies in haptic search.
    van Polanen V; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Sci Rep; 2014 Sep; 4():6254. PubMed ID: 25182940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.