836 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24457362)
1. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.
Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ
Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of corneal elevation with severity of keratoconus by means of anterior and posterior topographic analysis.
Ishii R; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Utsumi Y; Kumanomido T
Cornea; 2012 Mar; 31(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 22316650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus.
de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus.
Demir S; Ortak H; Yeter V; Alim S; Sayn O; Taş U; Sönmez B
Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intereye asymmetry detected by Scheimpflug imaging in subjects with normal corneas and keratoconus.
Henriquez MA; Izquierdo L; Mannis MJ
Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):779-82. PubMed ID: 23263222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases.
Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus.
Kovács I; Miháltz K; Kránitz K; Juhász É; Takács Á; Dienes L; Gergely R; Nagy ZZ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes.
Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A combination of topographic and pachymetric parameters in keratoconus diagnosis.
Toprak I; Yaylalı V; Yildirim C
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 25936634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes.
Reddy JC; Rapuano CJ; Cater JR; Suri K; Nagra PK; Hammersmith KM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 24680519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Pentacam and OrbscanII systems for the diagnosis of keratoconus suspects].
DU XL; Chen M; Ma L; Wang XX; Xie LX
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 48(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 22800453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of form fruste keratoconus.
Temstet C; Sandali O; Bouheraoua N; Hamiche T; Galan A; El Sanharawi M; Basli E; Laroche L; Borderie V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 25840306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas.
Shetty R; Rao H; Khamar P; Sainani K; Vunnava K; Jayadev C; Kaweri L
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 181():140-148. PubMed ID: 28687218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
