These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24457362)
1. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification. Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam. Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of corneal elevation with severity of keratoconus by means of anterior and posterior topographic analysis. Ishii R; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Utsumi Y; Kumanomido T Cornea; 2012 Mar; 31(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 22316650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus. Demir S; Ortak H; Yeter V; Alim S; Sayn O; Taş U; Sönmez B Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intereye asymmetry detected by Scheimpflug imaging in subjects with normal corneas and keratoconus. Henriquez MA; Izquierdo L; Mannis MJ Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):779-82. PubMed ID: 23263222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. Kovács I; Miháltz K; Kránitz K; Juhász É; Takács Á; Dienes L; Gergely R; Nagy ZZ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes. Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A combination of topographic and pachymetric parameters in keratoconus diagnosis. Toprak I; Yaylalı V; Yildirim C Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 25936634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes. Reddy JC; Rapuano CJ; Cater JR; Suri K; Nagra PK; Hammersmith KM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 24680519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Pentacam and OrbscanII systems for the diagnosis of keratoconus suspects]. DU XL; Chen M; Ma L; Wang XX; Xie LX Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 48(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 22800453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of form fruste keratoconus. Temstet C; Sandali O; Bouheraoua N; Hamiche T; Galan A; El Sanharawi M; Basli E; Laroche L; Borderie V J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 25840306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas. Shetty R; Rao H; Khamar P; Sainani K; Vunnava K; Jayadev C; Kaweri L Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 181():140-148. PubMed ID: 28687218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]