These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24458269)

  • 1. Judging a man by the width of his face: the role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events.
    Valentine KA; Li NP; Penke L; Perrett DI
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 25(3):806-11. PubMed ID: 24458269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
    Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-fulfilling prophecies as a link between men's facial width-to-height ratio and behavior.
    Haselhuhn MP; Wong EM; Ormiston ME
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72259. PubMed ID: 24015226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?
    Doll LM; Hill AK; Rotella MA; Cárdenas RA; Welling LL; Wheatley JR; Puts DA
    Hum Nat; 2014 Jun; 25(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 24578029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.
    Windhager S; Schaefer K; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2011; 23(6):805-14. PubMed ID: 21957062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance.
    Noser E; Schoch J; Ehlert U
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207333. PubMed ID: 30412629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
    Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
    Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial width-to-height ratio relates to alpha status and assertive personality in capuchin monkeys.
    Lefevre CE; Wilson VA; Morton FB; Brosnan SF; Paukner A; Bates TC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93369. PubMed ID: 24705247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.
    Roney JR; Hanson KN; Durante KM; Maestripieri D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2169-75. PubMed ID: 16901836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Redness enhances perceived aggression, dominance and attractiveness in men's faces.
    Stephen ID; Oldham FH; Perrett DI; Barton RA
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Aug; 10(3):562-72. PubMed ID: 22947678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
    Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R
    Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance.
    Marshall P; Bartolacci A; Burke D
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(1):1474704920910403. PubMed ID: 32124644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males.
    Swaddle JP; Reierson GW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Nov; 269(1507):2285-9. PubMed ID: 12495494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial width-to-height ratio in a large sample of Commonwealth Games athletes.
    Kramer RS
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Feb; 13(1):197-209. PubMed ID: 25714799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testosterone-dependent facial and body traits predict men's sociosexual attitudes and behaviors.
    Polo P; Muñoz-Reyes JA; Pita M; Shackelford TK; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2019 May; 31(3):e23235. PubMed ID: 30884051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of men's beauty and attractiveness by women with low sexual desire.
    Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Vorontsova-Wenger O; Pool E; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Sander D
    J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):946-55. PubMed ID: 25496510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.