105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24458892)
1. Methods for characterization of mechanical and electrical prosthetic vacuum pumps.
Komolafe O; Wood S; Caldwell R; Hansen A; Fatone S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(8):1069-78. PubMed ID: 24458892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real time monitoring of transtibial elevated vacuum prostheses: A case series on socket air pressure.
Schoepp KR; Schofield JS; Home D; Dawson MR; Lou E; Keri M; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0202716. PubMed ID: 30346953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets.
Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Brzostowski JT; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Oct; 84():75-83. PubMed ID: 32977925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of a volume-adjustable compression chamber for transradial prosthetic interface.
Sang Y; Li X; Luo Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):650-60. PubMed ID: 27146289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Prototype Hybrid Vacuum Pump to Provide Vacuum-Assisted Suspension for Above-Knee Prostheses.
Major MJ; Caldwell R; Fatone S
J Med Device; 2015 Dec; 9(4):0445041-445044. PubMed ID: 27462383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions.
Board WJ; Street GM; Caspers C
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Dec; 25(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 11860094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of elevated vacuum and suction prosthetic suspension systems in managing daily residual limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Brzostowski JT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Allyn KJ; Foster RL; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):155-163. PubMed ID: 32186238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using mechanical testing to assess texturing of prosthetic sockets to improve suspension in the transverse plane and reduce rotation.
Quinlan J; Subramanian V; Yohay J; Poziembo B; Fatone S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233148. PubMed ID: 32525868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between residual limb health, motion within the socket, and prosthetic suspension.
Baumann M; Price C; Brousseau L; Loftsgaarden M; Powell J; Sanders J; Childers WL
PM R; 2023 Apr; 15(4):510-521. PubMed ID: 36106688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using mechanical testing to assess the effect of lower-limb prosthetic socket texturing on longitudinal suspension.
Quinlan J; Yohay J; Subramanian V; Poziembo B; Fatone S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237841. PubMed ID: 32813733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanically and physiologically optimizing prosthetic elevated vacuum systems in people with transtibial amputation: a pilot study.
Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Larsen BG; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
J Prosthet Orthot; 2022 Oct; 34(4):194-201. PubMed ID: 36582938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost.
Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Progress Toward Optimizing Prosthetic Socket Fit and Suspension Using Elevated Vacuum to Promote Residual Limb Health.
Wernke MM; Schroeder RM; Haynes ML; Nolt LL; Albury AW; Colvin JM
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2017 Jul; 6(7):233-239. PubMed ID: 28736683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
