257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24458964)
1. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Gait Posture; 2014 Jun; 40(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 24852508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee.
Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation.
Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S
US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of ischial ramal angle for transfemoral ischial containment sockets.
Quigley M; Dillon MP; Fernandez RG; Erbas B; Briggs C
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30044195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfemoral socket design and suspension options.
Kapp SL
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):569-83, vi. PubMed ID: 10989479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subjective evaluations and objective measurements of the ischial-ramal containment prosthesis.
Hachisuka K; Umezu Y; Ogata H; Ohmine S; Shinkoda K; Arizono H
J UOEH; 1999 Jun; 21(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10434359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technique modifications for a suction suspension version of the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum socket: The Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Suction socket.
Caldwell R; Fatone S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 30223715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current transfemoral sockets.
Schuch CM; Pritham CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):48-54. PubMed ID: 10212595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.
Paternò L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses.
Boone DA; Kobayashi T; Chou TG; Arabian AK; Coleman KL; Orendurff MS; Zhang M
Gait Posture; 2013 Apr; 37(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 23177920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
