224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24460045)
1. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: the role of auditory working memory and musical activities.
Torppa R; Faulkner A; Huotilainen M; Järvikivi J; Lipsanen J; Laasonen M; Vainio M
Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 24460045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Links of Prosodic Stress Perception and Musical Activities to Language Skills of Children With Cochlear Implants and Normal Hearing.
Torppa R; Faulkner A; Laasonen M; Lipsanen J; Sammler D
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 31397704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
Li G; Soli SD; Zheng Y
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S49-S59. PubMed ID: 28532185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants.
Holt CM; McDermott HJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 24053225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants: A systematic review.
Chen Y; Wong LLN
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S7-S16. PubMed ID: 28296526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two are better than one: Differences in cortical EEG patterns during auditory and visual verbal working memory processing between Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implanted children.
Inguscio BMS; Cartocci G; Sciaraffa N; Nicastri M; Giallini I; Aricò P; Greco A; Babiloni F; Mancini P
Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109007. PubMed ID: 38608331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.
Penninger RT; Chien WW; Jiradejvong P; Boeke E; Carver CL; Limb CJ
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 23539260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verbal learning and memory in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.
Kronenberger WG; Henning SC; Ditmars AM; Roman AS; Pisoni DB
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 29933710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing aids.
Innes-Brown H; Marozeau JP; Storey CM; Blamey PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):789-806. PubMed ID: 24224987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users.
Näätänen R; Petersen B; Torppa R; Lonka E; Vuust P
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():57-75. PubMed ID: 28800468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.
Wang W; Zhou N; Xu L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 21190394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.
Luo X; Masterson ME; Wu CC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL8-14. PubMed ID: 24437857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: behavioral results and computational modeling.
Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Jameyson E; Rubinstein JT
Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():60-72. PubMed ID: 23333260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
