These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24460096)

  • 1. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Part-set cueing impairment & facilitation in semantic memory.
    Kelley MR; Parihar SA
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):1008-1018. PubMed ID: 29347877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention.
    Kelley MR; Strejc M; Walts ZL; Uribe Y; Gonzales L; Tcaturian E; Keller AE; Bronswick JK; Stephany SE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):928-943. PubMed ID: 33176603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the composition of part-set cues.
    Kroeger ME; Hueng NL; Curry SD; Copeland MB; Kelley MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2365-2370. PubMed ID: 30836817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall: a gradual part-list cueing paradigm.
    Garrido MV; Garcia-Marques L; Hamilton DL
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 22411179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The negative testing effect and multifactor account.
    Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23421505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part-set cuing facilitation for spatial information.
    Cole SM; Reysen MB; Kelley MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1615-20. PubMed ID: 23565782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of item similarity in part-list cueing impairment.
    Aslan A; Bauml KH
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):697-707. PubMed ID: 19575327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Part-list cuing of associative chains: tests of strategy disruption.
    Serra M; Oswald KM
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jul; 133(3):301-17. PubMed ID: 16937897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1282-97. PubMed ID: 26010827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suppression in retrieval practice, part-set cueing, and negative priming memory: the hydrogen model.
    Radvansky GA; Tamplin AK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1368-98. PubMed ID: 23170860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):378-97. PubMed ID: 21678155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Crocco S; Vitrano D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1211-1235. PubMed ID: 27049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.
    Bancroft TD; Hockley WE; Farquhar R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 22845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.