169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24460242)
1. Choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in QSAR.
Eklund M; Norinder U; Boyer S; Carlsson L
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 24460242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variable selection in near-infrared spectroscopy: benchmarking of feature selection methods on biodiesel data.
Balabin RM; Smirnov SV
Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Apr; 692(1-2):63-72. PubMed ID: 21501713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of QSAR/QSPR correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression.
Yao XJ; Panaye A; Doucet JP; Zhang RS; Chen HF; Liu MC; Hu ZD; Fan BT
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1257-66. PubMed ID: 15272833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study on feature selection for a risk prediction model for colorectal cancer.
Cueto-López N; García-Ordás MT; Dávila-Batista V; Moreno V; Aragonés N; Alaiz-Rodríguez R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():219-229. PubMed ID: 31319951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Partial least squares modeling and genetic algorithm optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Hasegawa K; Funatsu K
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2000; 11(3-4):189-209. PubMed ID: 10969871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feature selection and linear/nonlinear regression methods for the accurate prediction of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibitory activities.
Goodarzi M; Freitas MP; Jensen R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 19338295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiclass feature selection with kernel Gram-matrix-based criteria.
Ramona M; Richard G; David B
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1611-23. PubMed ID: 24808006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new hybrid intelligent system for accurate detection of Parkinson's disease.
Hariharan M; Polat K; Sindhu R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Mar; 113(3):904-13. PubMed ID: 24485390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of genetic algorithm-kernel partial least square as a novel nonlinear feature selection method: activity of carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors.
Jalali-Heravi M; Kyani A
Eur J Med Chem; 2007 May; 42(5):649-59. PubMed ID: 17316919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of support vector machine (SVM) for prediction toxic activity of different data sets.
Zhao CY; Zhang HX; Zhang XY; Liu MC; Hu ZD; Fan BT
Toxicology; 2006 Jan; 217(2-3):105-19. PubMed ID: 16213080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)--an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data.
Balabin RM; Lomakina EI
Analyst; 2011 Apr; 136(8):1703-12. PubMed ID: 21350755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction of blood-to-brain partitioning behavior using support vector machine.
Golmohammadi H; Dashtbozorgi Z; Acree WE
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2012 Sep; 47(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 22771548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of human breast and colon cancers from imbalanced data using nearest neighbor and support vector machines.
Majid A; Ali S; Iqbal M; Kausar N
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Mar; 113(3):792-808. PubMed ID: 24472367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds.
Ventura C; Latino DA; Martins F
Eur J Med Chem; 2013; 70():831-45. PubMed ID: 24246731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural networks in building QSAR models.
Baskin II; Palyulin VA; Zefirov NS
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 458():137-58. PubMed ID: 19065809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term time series prediction using OP-ELM.
Grigorievskiy A; Miche Y; Ventelä AM; Séverin E; Lendasse A
Neural Netw; 2014 Mar; 51():50-6. PubMed ID: 24365536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement of multivariate image analysis applied to quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis by using wavelet-principal component analysis ranking variable selection and least-squares support vector machine regression: QSAR study of checkpoint kinase WEE1 inhibitors.
Cormanich RA; Goodarzi M; Freitas MP
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Feb; 73(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 19207427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
