These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24460580)

  • 1. Gait-simulating fatigue loading analysis and sagittal alignment failure of spinal pelvic reconstruction after total sacrectomy: comparison of 3 techniques.
    Clark AJ; Tang JA; Leasure JM; Ivan ME; Kondrashov D; Buckley JM; Deviren V; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 24460580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three reconstruction techniques following total sacrectomy: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Macki M; De la Garza-Ramos R; Murgatroyd AA; Mullinix KP; Sun X; Cunningham BW; McCutcheon BA; Bydon M; Gokaslan ZL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):570-577. PubMed ID: 28777063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of spinopelvic reconstruction techniques in the setting of total sacrectomy.
    Mindea SA; Chinthakunta S; Moldavsky M; Gudipally M; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1622-7. PubMed ID: 23038619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of a lateral expandable cage and its comparison with a static device for lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical investigation.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Laun J; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 24484306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
    Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of an integrated fixation cage during fatigue loading: a human cadaver study.
    Palepu V; Peck JH; Simon DD; Helgeson MD; Nagaraja S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 28128700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
    Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
    Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
    Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical comparison of different types of lumbopelvic fixation.
    Tis JE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):E866-72. PubMed ID: 19910754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
    Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study.
    Liu X; Ma J; Park P; Huang X; Xie N; Ye X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 28153036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
    Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.
    Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Hsu B; Pahl DW; Transfeldt EE
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):807-14. PubMed ID: 19352729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supplemental rods are needed to maximally reduce rod strain across the lumbosacral junction with TLIF but not ALIF in long constructs.
    Godzik J; Hlubek RJ; Newcomb AGUS; Lehrman JN; de Andrada Pereira B; Farber SH; Lenke LG; Kelly BP; Turner JD
    Spine J; 2019 Jun; 19(6):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 30684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.
    Fleischer GD; Kim YJ; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Boachie-Adjei O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21857409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.