These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Open peer review: a route to democracy. Pharaon S J R Soc Med; 2007 Jan; 100(1):9. PubMed ID: 17197678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication. Gasparyan AY; Gerasimov AN; Voronov AA; Kitas GD J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 25829801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. John Whitridge Williams' contribution to democracy abroad. (The fetus treated as a patient). Vasicka A Ceska Gynekol; 1999 Apr; 64(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 10510556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Steinhauser G; Adlassnig W; Risch JA; Anderlini S; Arguriou P; Armendariz AZ; Bains W; Baker C; Barnes M; Barnett J; Baumgartner M; Baumgartner T; Bendall CA; Bender YS; Bichler M; Biermann T; Bini R; Blanco E; Bleau J; Brink A; Brown D; Burghuber C; Calne R; Carter B; Castaño C; Celec P; Celis ME; Clarke N; Cockrell D; Collins D; Coogan B; Craig J; Crilly C; Crowe D; Csoka AB; Darwich C; Del Kebos T; Derinaldi M; Dlamini B; Drewa T; Dwyer M; Eder F; de Palma RE; Esmay D; Rött CE; Exley C; Falkov R; Farber CI; Fearn W; Felsmann S; Flensmark J; Fletcher AK; Foster M; Fountoulakis KN; Fouratt J; Blanca JG; Sotelo MG; Gittler F; Gittler G; Gomez J; Gomez JF; Polar MG; Gonzalez J; Gösselsberger C; Habermacher L; Hajek M; Hakala F; Haliburton MS; Hankins JR; Hart J; Hasslberger S; Hennessey D; Herrmann A; Hersee M; Howard C; Humphries S; Isharc L; Ivanovski P; Jenuth S; Jerndal J; Johnson C; Keleta Y; Kenny A; Kidd B; Kohle F; Kolahi J; Koller-Peroutka M; Kostova L; Kumar A; Kurosawa A; Lance T; Lechermann M; Lendl B; Leuchters M; Lewis E; Lieb E; Lloyd G; Losek A; Lu Y; Maestracci S; Mangan D; Mares AW; Barnett JM; McClain V; McNair JS; Michael T; Miller L; Monzani P; Moran B; Morris M; Mößmer G; Mountain J; Phuthe OM; Muñoz M; Nakken S; Wambui AN; Neunteufl B; Nikolić D; Oberoi DV; Obmode G; Ogar L; Ohara J; Rybine NO; Owen B; Owen KW; Parikh R; Pearce NJ; Pemmer B; Piper C; Prince I; Reid T; Rindermann H; Risch S; Robbins J; Roberts S; Romero A; Rothe MT; Ruiz S; Sacher J; Sackl W; Salletmaier M; Sanand J; Sauerzopf C; Schwarzgruber T; Scott D; Seegers L; Seppi D; Shields K; Siller-Matula J; Singh B; Sithole S; Six F; Skoyles JR; Slofstra J; Sole DA; Sommer WF; Sonko M; Starr-Casanova CJ; Steakley ME; Steinhauser W; Steinhoff K; Sterba JH; Steppan M; Stindl R; Stokely J; Stokely K; St-Pierre G; Stratford J; Streli C; Stryg C; Sullivan M; Summhammer J; Tadesse A; Tavares D; Thompson L; Tomlinson A; Tozer J; Trevisanato SI; Trimmel M; Turner N; Vahur P; van der Byl J; van der Maas T; Varela L; Vega CA; Vermaak S; Villasenor A; Vogel M; von Wintzigerode G; Wagner C; Weinberger M; Weinberger P; Wilson N; Wolfe JF; Woodley MA; Young I; Zuraw G; Zwiren N Theor Med Bioeth; 2012 Oct; 33(5):359-76. PubMed ID: 23054375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safeguarding the integrity of science communication by restraining 'rational cheating' in peer review. Barroga EF J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1450-2. PubMed ID: 25408573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The evaluation of science and peer review: past and present]. Davyt A; Velho L Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos; 2000; 7(1):93-116. PubMed ID: 11625767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Peer Review a Hindrance to Good Science or a Gatekeeper Against Bad Science? Ramasamy A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 79(4):745-747. PubMed ID: 33373592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review, science, young investigators feelings and frustrations. Evora PR; Celotto AC Acta Cir Bras; 2011 Feb; 26(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 21271208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J Account Res; 2015; 22(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 25275622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of peer-reviewed journals in science. Weinberger M; Tierney WM; Ayanian JZ; Burnam A; Escarce JJ; Hays RD; Horner RD; McHorney CA; Oddone EZ; Romano P; Powe NR; Stearns SC Med Care; 2000 Jan; 38(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10630714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review by the Peers, for the Peers: response to Hettyey et al. Seppänen JT; Mönkkönen M; Kotiaho JS Trends Ecol Evol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):191-2. PubMed ID: 22325343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensationalism in the media: when scientists and journalists may be complicit collaborators. Ransohoff DF; Ransohoff RM Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 11525108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The physician scientist, peer review, and creativity. Fusaro RM J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 May; 40(5 Pt 1):786. PubMed ID: 10321616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cultivating global science. Suresh S Science; 2012 May; 336(6084):959. PubMed ID: 22628620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hurdles to international review scupper science in Romania. Miclăuș M; Micu O Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):189. PubMed ID: 29899485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Academic Cardiology and Social Media: Navigating the Wisdom and Madness of the Crowd. Yeh RW Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e004736. PubMed ID: 29650720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peerage of Science: will it work? Hettyey A; Griggio M; Mann M; Raveh S; Schaedelin FC; Thonhauser KE; Thoss M; van Dongen WF; White J; Zala SM; Penn DJ Trends Ecol Evol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):189-90. PubMed ID: 22325345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]