245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24460930)
1. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography.
Miller CA; Naish JH; Ainslie MP; Tonge C; Tout D; Arumugam P; Banerji A; Egdell RM; Clark D; Weale P; Steadman CD; McCann GP; Ray SG; Parker GJ; Schmitt M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 24460930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the arterial input sampling location on the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress myocardial perfusion quantification.
Milidonis X; Franks R; Schneider T; Sánchez-González J; Sammut EC; Plein S; Chiribiri A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 33775247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow: the impact of surface coil-related field inhomogeneity and a comparison of methods for its correction.
Miller CA; Hsu LY; Ta A; Conn H; Winkler S; Arai AE
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 25827156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole.
Motwani M; Kidambi A; Sourbron S; Fairbairn TA; Uddin A; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 24565078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of spatiotemporal fidelity in quantitative 3D first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Wissmann L; Gotschy A; Santelli C; Tezcan KC; Hamada S; Manka R; Kozerke S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 28125995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance derived myocardial perfusion measurements using advanced techniques: microsphere validation in an explanted pig heart system.
Schuster A; Zarinabad N; Ishida M; Sinclair M; van den Wijngaard JP; Morton G; Hautvast GL; Bigalke B; van Horssen P; Smith N; Spaan JA; Siebes M; Chiribiri A; Nagel E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Oct; 16(1):82. PubMed ID: 25315438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy.
Foley JRJ; Kidambi A; Biglands JD; Maredia N; Dickinson CJ; Plein S; Greenwood JP
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Nov; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 29110669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET.
Li R; Edalati M; Muccigrosso D; Lau JMC; Laforest R; Woodard PK; Zheng J
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Jun; 25(1):35. PubMed ID: 37344848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow by contrast-enhanced first-pass CMR perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in dogs and feasibility study in humans.
Hsu LY; Groves DW; Aletras AH; Kellman P; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 5(2):154-66. PubMed ID: 22340821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of myocardial blood flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison of distributed parameter and Fermi models with single and dual bolus.
Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Kershaw LE; Dweck MR; Alam S; Mirsadraee S; Connell M; Gray C; MacGillivray T; Newby DE; Semple SI
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 25885056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an automated method for arterial input function detection for first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Chang LC; Arai AE; Hsu LY
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Apr; 18():17. PubMed ID: 27055445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fully quantitative pixel-wise analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion improves discrimination of dark rim artifact from perfusion defects associated with epicardial coronary stenosis.
Ta AD; Hsu LY; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Shanbhag SM; Chen MY; Patricia Bandettini W; Arai AE
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Mar; 20(1):16. PubMed ID: 29514708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification.
Kellman P; Hansen MS; Nielles-Vallespin S; Nickander J; Themudo R; Ugander M; Xue H
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Apr; 19(1):43. PubMed ID: 28385161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sub-segmental quantification of single (stress)-pass perfusion CMR improves the diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Le MTP; Zarinabad N; D'Angelo T; Mia I; Heinke R; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 32028980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
