These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24461459)

  • 1. Assessing breast cancer risk models in Marin County, a population with high rates of delayed childbirth.
    Powell M; Jamshidian F; Cheyne K; Nititham J; Prebil LA; Ereman R
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Jun; 14(3):212-220.e1. PubMed ID: 24461459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.
    Terry MB; Liao Y; Whittemore AS; Leoce N; Buchsbaum R; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Chung WK; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Goldgar D; Giles GG; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; Andrulis IL; John EM; Phillips KA; Daly MB; Buys SS; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Apr; 20(4):504-517. PubMed ID: 30799262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Strauch K; Terry MB
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R144. PubMed ID: 23127309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of Breast Cancer Risk-Assessment Models in a Large Mammography Cohort.
    McCarthy AM; Guan Z; Welch M; Griffin ME; Sippo DA; Deng Z; Coopey SB; Acar A; Semine A; Parmigiani G; Braun D; Hughes KS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 May; 112(5):489-497. PubMed ID: 31556450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Kurian AW; Hughes E; Simmons T; Bernhisel R; Probst B; Meek S; Caswell-Jin JL; John EM; Lanchbury JS; Slavin TP; Wagner S; Gutin A; Rohan TE; Shadyab AH; Manson JE; Lane D; Chlebowski RT; Stefanick ML
    Cancer; 2021 Oct; 127(20):3742-3750. PubMed ID: 34228814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.
    Brentnall AR; Harkness EF; Astley SM; Donnelly LS; Stavrinos P; Sampson S; Fox L; Sergeant JC; Harvie MN; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Howell A; Cuzick J; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Dec; 17(1):147. PubMed ID: 26627479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical problems with clinical guidelines for breast cancer prevention based on remaining lifetime risk.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Hopper JL; Strauch K; Terry MB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25956172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry.
    Pal Choudhury P; Brook MN; Hurson AN; Lee A; Mulder CV; Coulson P; Schoemaker MJ; Jones ME; Swerdlow AJ; Chatterjee N; Antoniou AC; Garcia-Closas M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Feb; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 33588869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the key risk factors: family history, mammographic density and polygenic risk.
    Allman R; Mu Y; Dite GS; Spaeth E; Hopper JL; Rosner BA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):335-347. PubMed ID: 36749458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.
    Zhang L; Jie Z; Xu S; Zhang L; Guo X
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5528-5532. PubMed ID: 30089770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of breast cancer risk assessment tools on a French-Canadian population-based cohort.
    Jantzen R; Payette Y; de Malliard T; Labbé C; Noisel N; Broët P
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e045078. PubMed ID: 33846154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool Among Women Age 75 Years and Older.
    Schonberg MA; Li VW; Eliassen AH; Davis RB; LaCroix AZ; McCarthy EP; Rosner BA; Chlebowski RT; Rohan TE; Hankinson SE; Marcantonio ER; Ngo LH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Mar; 108(3):. PubMed ID: 26625899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating breast cancer risk projections for Hispanic women.
    Banegas MP; Gail MH; LaCroix A; Thompson B; Martinez ME; Wactawski-Wende J; John EM; Hubbell FA; Yasmeen S; Katki HA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 132(1):347-53. PubMed ID: 22147080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women by hormone receptor status.
    Chlebowski RT; Anderson GL; Lane DS; Aragaki AK; Rohan T; Yasmeen S; Sarto G; Rosenberg CA; Hubbell FA;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1695-705. PubMed ID: 18000216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in reproductive risk factors for breast cancer in middle-aged women in Marin County, California and a sociodemographically similar area of Northern California.
    Lea CS; Gordon NP; Prebil LA; Ereman R; Uratsu CS; Powell M
    BMC Womens Health; 2009 Mar; 9():6. PubMed ID: 19320996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in US Hispanic Women.
    Banegas MP; John EM; Slattery ML; Gomez SL; Yu M; LaCroix AZ; Pee D; Chlebowski RT; Hines LM; Thompson CA; Gail MH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 28003316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Models by Race/Ethnicity, Family History and Molecular Subtypes.
    McCarthy AM; Liu Y; Ehsan S; Guan Z; Liang J; Huang T; Hughes K; Semine A; Kontos D; Conant E; Lehman C; Armstrong K; Braun D; Parmigiani G; Chen J
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 35008209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using SNP genotypes to improve the discrimination of a simple breast cancer risk prediction model.
    Dite GS; Mahmoodi M; Bickerstaffe A; Hammet F; Macinnis RJ; Tsimiklis H; Dowty JG; Apicella C; Phillips KA; Giles GG; Southey MC; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):887-96. PubMed ID: 23774992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent trends in hormone therapy utilization and breast cancer incidence rates in the high incidence population of Marin County, California.
    Ereman RR; Prebil LA; Mockus M; Koblick K; Orenstein F; Benz C; Clarke CA
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Apr; 10():228. PubMed ID: 20433756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inclusion of Endogenous Plasma Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate and Mammographic Density in Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer.
    Gabrielson M; Ubhayasekera KA; Acharya SR; Franko MA; Eriksson M; Bergquist J; Czene K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 31948996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.