These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24461706)
1. A region-based anatomical landmark configuration for sinus surgery using image guided navigation system: a phantom-study. Ahmadian A; Fathi Kazerooni A; Mohagheghi S; Amini Khoiy K; Sadr Hosseini M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 24461706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy assessment of a marker-free method for registration of CT and stereo images applied in image-guided implantology: a phantom study. Mohagheghi S; Ahmadian A; Yaghoobee S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 25441868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery. Knott PD; Batra PS; Butler RS; Citardi MJ Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1877-81. PubMed ID: 17003709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in image-guided cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Zhang W; Wang C; Yu H; Liu Y; Shen G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 39(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 21067938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimization of target registration error for vertebra in image-guided spine surgery. Ershad M; Ahmadian A; Dadashi Serej N; Saberi H; Amini Khoiy K Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jan; 9(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 23820761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fiducial markers configuration optimization in image-guided surgery. Bao N; Chen Y; Yue Y; Li H; Cui Z; Zhuang J; Tian S; Kang Y Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3361-71. PubMed ID: 25227046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of fiducial distribution on headset-based registration in image-guided sinus surgery. Knott PD; Maurer CR; Gallivan R; Roh HJ; Citardi MJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Nov; 131(5):666-72. PubMed ID: 15523446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fiducial optimization for minimal target registration error in image-guided neurosurgery. Shamir RR; Joskowicz L; Shoshan Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 22156977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contour Map Point Distribution and Surgeon Experience Level Affect Accuracy of Surgical Navigation in a Pilot Study. Talmadge J; Jiang ZY; Zebda DA; Yao WC; Luong AU; Citardi MJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2022 Apr; 131(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 34121472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hybrid method to improve target registration accuracy in surgical navigation. Jeon S; Park J; Chien J; Hong J Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015; 24(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 25761496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Registration of CT to 3D ultrasound using near-field fiducial localization: A feasibility study. Kingma R; Rohling RN; Nguan C Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(2):54-70. PubMed ID: 21322745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guided ultrasound calibration: where, how, and how many calibration fiducials. Chen EC; Peters TM; Ma B Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):889-98. PubMed ID: 27038966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental validation of predicted application accuracies for computer-assisted (CAS) intraoperative navigation with paired-point registration. Perwög M; Bardosi Z; Freysinger W Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Mar; 13(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 28801767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Vrielinck L; Lambrichts I; Politis C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 23273492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study. Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of computer reconstruction of the frontal and sagittal planes of the facial structures]. Veillon F; Kahn JL; Douzal V; Bourjat P; Oswald P; Bloch P Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1992; 93(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 1502448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation. Bartling SH; Leinung M; Graute J; Rodt T; Dullin C; Becker H; Lenarz T; Stover T; Majdani O Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 17195752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy analysis of line-based registration for image guided neurosurgery at different operating areas - a phantom study. Ji D; Dong Y; Wang M; Song Z Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):148-156. PubMed ID: 29058485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in intraoperative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery. Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3643-8. PubMed ID: 19163500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical landmarks for point-matching registration in image-guided neurosurgery. Omara AI; Wang M; Fan Y; Song Z Int J Med Robot; 2014 Mar; 10(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23733606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]