227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24461950)
1. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
Price RB; Gerrow JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Machado CE; Guedes CG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 22230998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin.
Chen L; Kleverlaan CJ; Liang K; Yang D
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):552-558. PubMed ID: 27765393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Nitrile Gloves on the Setting Behavior of Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty Impression Materials.
Delgado AJ; Amaya-Pajares SP; Su Y; Behar-Horenstein L; Donovan TE
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29469997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Al-Sowygh ZH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
