These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24461950)

  • 1. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
    de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
    Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Machado CE; Guedes CG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 22230998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin.
    Chen L; Kleverlaan CJ; Liang K; Yang D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):552-558. PubMed ID: 27765393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
    Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Nitrile Gloves on the Setting Behavior of Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty Impression Materials.
    Delgado AJ; Amaya-Pajares SP; Su Y; Behar-Horenstein L; Donovan TE
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29469997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
    Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
    Al-Sowygh ZH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
    Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.