These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24462569)

  • 1. Quantitative assessments of municipal waste management systems: using different indicators to compare and rank programs in New York State.
    Greene KL; Tonjes DJ
    Waste Manag; 2014 Apr; 34(4):825-36. PubMed ID: 24462569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature.
    Cleary J
    Environ Int; 2009 Nov; 35(8):1256-66. PubMed ID: 19682746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA; Weitz K; Jambeck J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the environmental performance of construction materials testing using EMS: An Australian study.
    Dejkovski N
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():359-66. PubMed ID: 27444844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental-benefit analysis of two urban waste collection systems.
    Aranda Usón A; Ferreira G; Zambrana Vásquez D; Zabalza Bribián I; Llera Sastresa E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():72-7. PubMed ID: 23792249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical analysis in MSW collection performance assessment.
    Teixeira CA; Avelino C; Ferreira F; Bentes I
    Waste Manag; 2014 Sep; 34(9):1584-94. PubMed ID: 24863624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment.
    Giugliano M; Cernuschi S; Grosso M; Rigamonti L
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):2092-101. PubMed ID: 21482096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life-cycle assessment of the municipal solid waste management system in Hangzhou, China (EASEWASTE).
    Zhao Y; Wang HT; Lu WJ; Damgaard A; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Jun; 27(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 19470539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention.
    Gentil EC; Gallo D; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2011 Dec; 31(12):2371-9. PubMed ID: 21924602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does performance evaluation help public managers? A Balanced Scorecard approach in urban waste services.
    Guimarães B; Simões P; Marques RC
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2632-8. PubMed ID: 20696516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A screening life cycle metric to benchmark the environmental sustainability of waste management systems.
    Kaufman SM; Krishnan N; Themelis NJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(15):5949-55. PubMed ID: 20666561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National waste prevention programs: indicators on progress and barriers.
    Wilts H
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):29-35. PubMed ID: 22993133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of national municipal solid waste generation assessments in the USA.
    Tonjes DJ; Greene KL
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Aug; 30(8):758-71. PubMed ID: 22738808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill.
    Sumathi VR; Natesan U; Sarkar C
    Waste Manag; 2008 Nov; 28(11):2146-60. PubMed ID: 18060759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy.
    Cherubini F; Bargigli S; Ulgiati S
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2552-64. PubMed ID: 18230413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A purview of waste management evolution: special emphasis on USA.
    Kollikkathara N; Feng H; Stern E
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):974-85. PubMed ID: 18796347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in the management of residual municipal solid waste.
    Rada EC; Istrate IA; Ragazzi M
    Environ Technol; 2009 Jun; 30(7):651-61. PubMed ID: 19705602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytical framework and data for a municipal solid waste environmental performance assessment.
    Deus RM; Mele FD; Bezerra BS; Battistelle RAG
    Data Brief; 2020 Feb; 28():105085. PubMed ID: 32226818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.