177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24462591)
21. Description and validation of the Pelv-Sim: a training model designed to improve gynecologic minimally invasive suturing skills.
Arden D; Hacker MR; Jones DB; Awtrey CS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 18971133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of a Low-Fidelity Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Simulation Model and Evaluation of Curriculum.
Karaoğlan T; Aydin S; Bilginer U
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Aug; 27(8):474-480. PubMed ID: 34027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study.
Cucinella G; Calagna G; Romano G; Di Buono G; Gugliotta G; Saitta S; Adile G; Manzone M; Accardi G; Perino A; Agrusa A
G Chir; 2016; 37(3):113-117. PubMed ID: 27734794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of the Limbs and Things Hysterectomy Model to Describe the Process for Establishing Validity.
DeStephano CC; Chen AH; Heckman MG; Chimato NT; Guha P; Espinal M; Dinh TA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29432903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Video Coaching on Gynecologic Resident Laparoscopic Suturing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rindos NB; Wroble-Biglan M; Ecker A; Lee TT; Donnellan NM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 28063907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Teaching Vaginal Surgery to Junior Residents: Initial Validation of 3 Novel Procedure-Specific Low-Fidelity Models.
Geoffrion R; Suen MW; Koenig NA; Yong P; Brennand E; Mehra N; Larouche M; Lee T; Todd NJ
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 26706397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modular comparison of laparoscopic and robotic simulation platforms in residency training: a randomized trial.
Borahay MA; Haver MC; Eastham B; Patel PR; Kilic GS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):871-9. PubMed ID: 23811381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: laparoscopic or vaginal sacrocolpopexy?].
Descargues G; Collard P; Grise P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Oct; 36(10):978-83. PubMed ID: 18823810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying.
Chang OH; King LP; Modest AM; Hur HC
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 26597729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validating a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.
Shore EM; Grantcharov TP; Husslein H; Shirreff L; Dedy NJ; McDermott CD; Lefebvre GG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):204.e1-204.e11. PubMed ID: 27131588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Traditional Versus Simulation Resident Surgical Laparoscopic Salpingectomy Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Patel NR; Makai GE; Sloan NL; Della Badia CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 26590067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and Validation of a Vaginal Anterior Repair Simulation Model for Surgical Training.
O'Meara A; Ramaseshan AS; O'Sullivan DM; Tunitsky-Bitton E
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e290-e294. PubMed ID: 32675628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Curriculum development for basic gynaecological laparoscopy with comparison of expert trainee opinions; prospective cross-sectional observational study.
Burden C; Fox R; Lenguerrand E; Hinshaw K; Draycott TJ; James M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():1-7. PubMed ID: 24973478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical and functional outcomes.
Chan CM; Liang HH; Go WW; To WW; Mok KM
Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Aug; 17(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21813899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of a xenogenic barrier to prevent mesh erosion with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Ross JW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 17630165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy Using Barbed Suture Anchoring and Peritoneal Tunneling Technique: Tips and Tricks.
Guan X; Ma Y; Gisseman J; Kleithermes C; Liu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):12-13. PubMed ID: 27344033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proficiency for Advanced Laparoscopic Procedures in Gynecologic Residency Program: Do all Residents Need to be Trained?
Driessen SR; Janse JA; Schreuder HW; Jansen FW
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(5):942-8. PubMed ID: 25921187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
