These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24462699)

  • 21. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct resin composite restorations in vital versus root-filled posterior teeth: a controlled comparative long-term follow-up.
    Adolphi G; Zehnder M; Bachmann LM; Göhring TN
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 17910219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement.
    Nash RW; Lowe RA; Leinfelder K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1099-104. PubMed ID: 11575016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct and semi-direct posterior composite restorations.
    Spreafico R
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Sep; 8(7):703-12; quiz 714. PubMed ID: 9242143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of resin-based composite in children.
    Donly KJ; García-Godoy F
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 12412963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Functional and aesthetic guidelines for stress-reduced direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 22816500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repair versus replacement of defective direct dental restorations in posterior teeth of adults.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD
    Prim Dent J; 2014 May; 3(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 25215344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An integration of composite resin with natural tooth structure: the Class IV restoration.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 16(3):235-42; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 15199699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Direct fiber-reinforced composite restoration in an endodontically-treated molar: a three-year case report.
    Deliperi S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 18435197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct cuspal-coverage posterior resin composite restorations: A case report.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 16536206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite.
    Christensen JJ
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
    Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.