279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24463160)
1. Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Mehta DA; Hay JW
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 24463160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consolidation paclitaxel is more cost-effective than bevacizumab following upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Lesnock JL; Farris C; Krivak TC; Smith KJ; Markman M
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 21665250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Markov model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of antiangiogenesis therapy using bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.
Minion LE; Bai J; Monk BJ; Robin Keller L; Ramez EN; Forde GK; Chan JK; Tewari KS
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 137(3):490-6. PubMed ID: 25766118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of alternative strategies for incorporating bevacizumab into the primary treatment of ovarian cancer.
Barnett JC; Alvarez Secord A; Cohn DE; Leath CA; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Cancer; 2013 Oct; 119(20):3653-61. PubMed ID: 23921967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost-utility analysis of NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol 218: incorporating prospectively collected quality-of-life scores in an economic model of treatment of ovarian cancer.
Cohn DE; Barnett JC; Wenzel L; Monk BJ; Burger RA; Straughn JM; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 136(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 25449568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cohn DE; Kim KH; Resnick KE; O'Malley DM; Straughn JM
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21383297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of dose-dense versus standard intravenous chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An economic analysis of results from the Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 262 randomized controlled trial.
Seagle BL; Shahabi S
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28196674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adding bevacizumab to single agent chemotherapy for the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A cost effectiveness analysis of the AURELIA trial.
Wysham WZ; Schaffer EM; Coles T; Roque DR; Wheeler SB; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 May; 145(2):340-345. PubMed ID: 28291545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost Effectiveness of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Targeted Biologics in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Poonawalla IB; Parikh RC; Du XL; VonVille HM; Lairson DR
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1155-85. PubMed ID: 26072142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wan X; Luo X; Tan C; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Peng L
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3526-3534. PubMed ID: 31287562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Markov-modeling for the administration of platinum analogues and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy as well as topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin as second-line chemotherapy with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
Fedders M; Hartmann M; Schneider A; Kath R; Camara O; Oelschläger H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 133(9):619-25. PubMed ID: 17458562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of combination versus sequential docetaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Pokrzywinski R; Revicki D; Higgins RV; Nycum LR; Kohler MF; Berchuck A; Myers ER; Secord AA
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 21598242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Criss SD; Mooradian MJ; Watson TR; Gainor JF; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911952. PubMed ID: 31553470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Using Evidence from the ICON7 Trial.
Hinde S; Epstein D; Cook A; Embleton A; Perren T; Sculpher M
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 27325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bevacizumab in treatment of high-risk ovarian cancer--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chan JK; Herzog TJ; Hu L; Monk BJ; Kiet T; Blansit K; Kapp DS; Yu X
Oncologist; 2014 May; 19(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 24721817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A trial-based assessment of the cost-utility of bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Goulart B; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):836-45. PubMed ID: 21914503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in specialist oncology centers in France.
Petitjean A; Smith-Palmer J; Valentine W; Tehard B; Roze S
BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 30744578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis.
Neyt M; Vlayen J; Devriese S; Camberlin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195134. PubMed ID: 29630612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Kovic B; Xie F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(20):2296-302. PubMed ID: 26014296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
