These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24464195)
21. What determines the duration of war? Insights from assessment strategies in animal contests. Briffa M PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108491. PubMed ID: 25247403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Evolutionary stability analysis of asymmetric hawk-dove game considering the impact of common resource]. Liu QL; He JZ; Yang Y; Wang YQ; Gao L; Li YT; Wang RW Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2012 Aug; 33(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 22855444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The forager's dilemma: food sharing and food defense as risk-sensitive foraging options. Dubois F; Giraldeau LA Am Nat; 2003 Dec; 162(6):768-79. PubMed ID: 14737714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The asymmetric Hawk-Dove game with costs measured as time lost. Křivan V; Cressman R J Theor Biol; 2022 Aug; 547():111162. PubMed ID: 35577103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evidence for mutual assessment in a wild primate. Benítez ME; Pappano DJ; Beehner JC; Bergman TJ Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):2952. PubMed ID: 28592809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Game-Theoretical Winner and Loser Model of Dominance Hierarchy Formation. Kura K; Broom M; Kandler A Bull Math Biol; 2016 Jun; 78(6):1259-90. PubMed ID: 27342253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inter-unit contests within a provisioned troop of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains, China. Zhao Q; Tan CL Am J Primatol; 2011 Mar; 73(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 20938946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment during Intergroup Contests. Green PA; Briffa M; Cant MA Trends Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 36(2):139-150. PubMed ID: 33187729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila. Tanner CJ Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Nov; 273(1602):2737-42. PubMed ID: 17015327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of direct and indirect genetic effects in fighting sea anemones. Lane SM; Wilson AJ; Briffa M Behav Ecol; 2020; 31(2):540-547. PubMed ID: 32210526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The evolution of individual variation in communication strategies. Botero CA; Pen I; Komdeur J; Weissing FJ Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3123-33. PubMed ID: 20561050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Familial strife on the seashore: aggression increases with relatedness in the sea anemone Actinia equina. Foster NL; Briffa M Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():243-5. PubMed ID: 24463009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. When should signals of submission be given?-A game theory model. Matsumura S; Hayden TJ J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 16293264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. Kokko H; Lopez-Sepulcre A; Morrell LJ Am Nat; 2006 Jun; 167(6):901-12. PubMed ID: 16685641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Individual-based simulations of the War of Attrition. Just W; Zhu F Behav Processes; 2004 Apr; 66(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 15062971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reputation and the evolution of conflict. McElreath R J Theor Biol; 2003 Feb; 220(3):345-57. PubMed ID: 12468284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simulating natural selection as a culling mechanism on finite populations with the hawk-dove game. Fogel GB; Fogel DB Biosystems; 2011 Apr; 104(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 21219966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]