BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24464637)

  • 1. An attentional-adaptation account of spatial negative priming: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu XL; Walsh MM; Reder LM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 14(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 24464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The adaptive character of the attentional system: statistical sensitivity in a target localization task.
    Reder LM; Weber K; Shang J; Vanyukov PM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):631-49. PubMed ID: 12848330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Levels of visuo-spatial selection: an ERP study of negative priming.
    Gibbons H; Wiegleb N; Stahl J
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Nov; 83(2):203-17. PubMed ID: 24056236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related brain potential variations during location and identity negative priming.
    Kathmann N; Bogdahn B; Endrass T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Feb; 394(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 16263217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Frings C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 20079389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial negative priming: Location or response?
    Neill WT; Kleinsmith AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2411-2419. PubMed ID: 27465862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consecutive repetition effects for affective-distractor pictures in a visual oddball task: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.
    Jiang D; Zheng X; Li F
    Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 1517():68-76. PubMed ID: 23628477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positional priming of pop-out: a relational-encoding account.
    Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 20462304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 23077027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where memory meets attention: neural substrates of negative priming.
    Egner T; Hirsch J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1774-84. PubMed ID: 16269113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive and negative priming differences between short-term and long-term identity coding of word-specific attentional priorities.
    McLennan KS; Neumann E; Russell PN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1426-1441. PubMed ID: 30644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the role of probe distractors in negative priming: location negative priming is observed when probe distractors are consistently absent.
    Chao HF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1072-82. PubMed ID: 19525538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load reduces visual identity negative priming by disabling the retrieval of task-inappropriate prime information: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Stahl J
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1330():101-13. PubMed ID: 20233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The error protection impact of inhibitory after-effects in a location-based task and its preservation with practice.
    Buckolz E; Stoddart A; Edgar C; Khan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1721-8. PubMed ID: 24924849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERP correlates of auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Niedeggen M; Buchner A; Pietrowsky R
    Cognition; 2003 Dec; 90(2):B11-21. PubMed ID: 14599757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cooperative and opposing effects of strategic and involuntary attention.
    Mazza V; Dallabona M; Chelazzi L; Turatto M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2838-51. PubMed ID: 21265602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.