These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24464637)

  • 21. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Event-related brain potential correlates of identity negative priming from overlapping pictures.
    Behrendt J; Gibbons H; Schrobsdorff H; Ihrke M; Herrmann JM; Hasselhorn M
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):921-30. PubMed ID: 20230496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Event-related potential correlates of visual identity negative priming unbiased by trial-by-trial effects.
    Hinojosa JA; Pozo MA; Méndez-Bértolo C; Luna D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):531-7. PubMed ID: 19101065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):744-56. PubMed ID: 26233234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do not look there: the impact of facial expression on location negative priming.
    Gan T; Luo W; Feng W; Luo YJ
    Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(17):875-80. PubMed ID: 21968322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanisms of target localization in visual change detection: an interplay of gating and filtering.
    Schneider D; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():311-9. PubMed ID: 24001756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.
    Couperus JW; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1359():155-77. PubMed ID: 20807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of selective attention in the positivity offset: Evidence from event related potentials.
    Booy RM; Carolan PL
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258640. PubMed ID: 34731204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task.
    Buckolz E; Goldfarb A; Khan M
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):837-45. PubMed ID: 15495908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can the location negative priming process operate in a proactive manner?
    Buckolz E; Guy S; Khan M; Lawrence G
    Psychol Res; 2006 May; 70(3):218-27. PubMed ID: 15696340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength.
    Gibbons H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 21798292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prime-trial processing demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task.
    Buckolz E; Avramidis C; Fitzgeorge L
    Psychol Res; 2008 May; 72(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 17277945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.
    Wesslein AK; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.
    Forster B; Pavone EF
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18405047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrophysiological correlates of visual identity negative priming.
    Frings C; Groh-Bordin C
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1176():82-91. PubMed ID: 17904111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.