These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24465078)

  • 1. APPROXIMATING POWER OF THE UNCONDITIONAL TEST FOR CORRELATED BINARY PAIRS.
    Selicato GR; Muller KE
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 1998; 27(2):553-564. PubMed ID: 24465078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample size evaluation for the McNemar test with application to matched case-control studies.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(9):1239-51. PubMed ID: 1509223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power calculation of adjusted McNemar's test based on clustered data of varying cluster size.
    Wu Y
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1190-1200. PubMed ID: 30288765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.
    Berger RL; Sidik K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 12665205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact conditional and unconditional sample size for pair-matched studies with binary outcome: a practical guide.
    Royston P
    Stat Med; 1993 Apr; 12(7):699-712. PubMed ID: 8511446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design of randomized clinical trials with a binary endpoint: Conditional versus unconditional analyses of a two-by-two table.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(16):3109-3123. PubMed ID: 38780538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint comparison of the predictive values of multiple binary diagnostic tests: an extension of McNemar's test.
    Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 35576934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on exact conditional and unconditional tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
    Shan G
    Hum Hered; 2013; 76(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 23921792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 2 x 2 matched-pairs trial: exact unconditional design and analysis.
    Suissa S; Shuster JJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):361-72. PubMed ID: 1912252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The special case of the 2 × 2 table: asymptotic unconditional McNemar test can be used to estimate sample size even for analysis based on GEE.
    Borkhoff CM; Johnston PR; Stephens D; Atenafu E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):733-9. PubMed ID: 25510372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the sample size for one-sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar's test.
    Lu Y; Bean JA
    Stat Med; 1995 Aug; 14(16):1831-9. PubMed ID: 7481214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size and power for McNemar's test with clustered data.
    Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2283-94. PubMed ID: 15236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional.
    Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():91. PubMed ID: 23848987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighted McNemar's test for the comparison of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias.
    Wu Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Jul; 41(16):3149-3163. PubMed ID: 35428039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions.
    Mehrotra DV; Chan IS; Berger RL
    Biometrics; 2003 Jun; 59(2):441-50. PubMed ID: 12926729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approximating the distribution of maximally selected McNemar's statistics.
    Rabinowitz D; Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):897-902. PubMed ID: 10985234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unconditional exact tests for equivalence or noninferiority for paired binary endpoints.
    Hsueh HM; Liu JP; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 11414572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(10):1081-96. PubMed ID: 9179976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new exact and more powerful unconditional test of no treatment effect from binary matched pairs.
    Lloyd CJ
    Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):716-723. PubMed ID: 18047530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.