BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24465771)

  • 1. KRAS early testing: consensus initiative and cost-effectiveness evaluation for metastatic colorectal patients in an Italian setting.
    Barone C; Pinto C; Normanno N; Capussotti L; Cognetti F; Falcone A; Mantovani L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85897. PubMed ID: 24465771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
    Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Noake C; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Oct; 18(62):1-132. PubMed ID: 25314637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective.
    Blank PR; Moch H; Szucs TD; Schwenkglenks M
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 17(19):6338-46. PubMed ID: 21807639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
    Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Behl AS; Goddard KA; Flottemesch TJ; Veenstra D; Meenan RT; Lin JS; Maciosek MV
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(23):1785-95. PubMed ID: 23197490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
    Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
    Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial.
    Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(27):e3762. PubMed ID: 27399059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cetuximab-based or bevacizumab-based first-line treatment in patients with KRAS p.G13D-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis.
    Modest DP; Reinacher-Schick A; Stintzing S; Giessen C; Tannapfel A; Laubender RP; Brodowicz T; Knittelfelder R; Vrbanec D; Schmiegel W; Heinemann V; Zielinski CC
    Anticancer Drugs; 2012 Jul; 23(6):666-73. PubMed ID: 22441566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
    Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study.
    Wen F; Yang Y; Zhang P; Zhang J; Zhou J; Tang R; Chen H; Zheng H; Fu P; Li Q
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2015; 16(11):1577-84. PubMed ID: 26418570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cetuximab Might Be Detrimental to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with KRAS Codon 12 Mutations.
    Liang YH; Lin YL; Liau JY; Tsai JH; Liang JT; Lin BR; Hung JS; Tseng LH; Lin LI; Chang YL; Cheng AL; Yeh KH
    Anticancer Res; 2015 Jul; 35(7):4207-14. PubMed ID: 26124380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metastatic colorectal cancer treatment patterns according to kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog genotype in U.S. Community-based oncology practices.
    Landsman-Blumberg PB; Carter GC; Johnson BH; Sedgley R; Nicol SJ; Li L; Shankaran V
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2014 Sep; 13(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 25065655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.
    De Roock W; Jonker DJ; Di Nicolantonio F; Sartore-Bianchi A; Tu D; Siena S; Lamba S; Arena S; Frattini M; Piessevaux H; Van Cutsem E; O'Callaghan CJ; Khambata-Ford S; Zalcberg JR; Simes J; Karapetis CS; Bardelli A; Tejpar S
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(16):1812-20. PubMed ID: 20978259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
    László L
    Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.