These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24465813)

  • 21. Influence of near threshold visual distractors on perceptual detection and reaching movements.
    Deplancke A; Madelain L; Chauvin A; Cardoso-Leite P; Gorea A; Coello Y
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 104(4):2249-56. PubMed ID: 20702742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of saliency on manual reach trajectories and reach target selection.
    van Zoest W; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):179-87. PubMed ID: 25536468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anarchic hand syndrome: bimanual coordination and sensitivity to irrelevant information in unimanual reaches.
    Kritikos A; Breen N; Mattingley JB
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):634-47. PubMed ID: 15921901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distractor effects on pointing: the role of spatial layout.
    Fischer MH; Adam JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 11291731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.
    McIntosh RD; Buonocore A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 220(3-4):201-11. PubMed ID: 22684944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Involvement of the primary motor cortex in controlling movements executed with the ipsilateral hand differs between left- and right-handers.
    van den Berg FE; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3456-69. PubMed ID: 21452954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fitts's law in a selective reaching task: the proximity-to-hand effect of action-centered attention revisited.
    Welsh TN; Zbinden M
    Motor Control; 2009 Jan; 13(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 19246781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.
    Blinch J; de Cellio Martins G; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):247-257. PubMed ID: 27695912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A kinematic analysis of distractor interference effects during visually guided action in spatial neglect.
    Corben LA; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 11311034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effector selection precedes reach planning in the dorsal parietofrontal cortex.
    Bernier PM; Cieslak M; Grafton ST
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 108(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 22457458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distractor interference in selective reaching: dissociating distance and grouping effects.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Jun; 35(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 12711583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional selection in tactile search tasks: The impact of singleton distractors on target selection.
    Mena CI; Lang K; Gherri E
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13592. PubMed ID: 32412112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Dissociated effects of residual spatial neglect.
    Chieffi S; Gentilucci M; Allport A; Sasso E; Rizzolatti G
    Brain; 1993 Oct; 116 ( Pt 5)():1119-37. PubMed ID: 8221051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1931-44. PubMed ID: 25850406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.
    Menger R; Van der Stigchel S; Dijkerman HC
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 229(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 23811730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.
    Blinch J; Cameron BD; Cressman EK; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):947-55. PubMed ID: 24381087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal dissociation between distractors and targets: the impact of residual distractor processing on target responses.
    Kritikos A; McNeill J; Pavlis A
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18316295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.