These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24468288)
21. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Limited value of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Eto H; Hara I Hinyokika Kiyo; 2005 Apr; 51(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 15912782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CD10 is inversely associated with nuclear factor-kappa B and predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Voutsadakis IA; Vlachostergios PJ; Daliani DD; Karasavvidou F; Kakkas G; Moutzouris G; Melekos MD; Papandreou CN Urol Int; 2012; 88(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 22286396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence. Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens. Kimura K; Tsuzuki T; Kato M; Saito AM; Sassa N; Ishida R; Hirabayashi H; Yoshino Y; Hattori R; Gotoh M Prostate; 2014 May; 74(6):680-7. PubMed ID: 24481730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report. Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer. Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Low serum testosterone levels are associated with positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy: hypogonadism represents bad prognosis in prostate cancer. Teloken C; Da Ros CT; Caraver F; Weber FA; Cavalheiro AP; Graziottin TM J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2178-80. PubMed ID: 16280759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis. Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive value of the differential expression of the urokinase plasminogen activation axis in radical prostatectomy patients. Gupta A; Lotan Y; Ashfaq R; Roehrborn CG; Raj GV; Aragaki CC; Montorsi F; Shariat SF Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1124-33. PubMed ID: 18585843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer. Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy. Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy. Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Existence of pattern 5 on radical prostatectomy: poor prognostic factor associated with a lower biochemical recurrence-free survival]. Pastori J; Balssa L; Lillaz J; Guichard G; Chabannes E; Bernardini S; Bittard H; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Kleinclauss F Prog Urol; 2014 Jun; 24(7):433-40. PubMed ID: 24861683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The correlation among the percentage of positive biopsy cores from the dominant side of prostate, adverse pathology, and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Memis A; Ugurlu O; Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Aktas BK; Akdemir AO Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):307-13. PubMed ID: 21802641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]