These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2446847)

  • 1. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model.
    Hari R; Joutsiniemi SL; Sarvas J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 2446847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution.
    Supek S; Aine CJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 8262534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Locating accuracy of a current source of neuromagnetic responses: simulation study for a single current dipole in a spherical conductor.
    Kuriki S; Murase M; Takeuchi F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Dec; 73(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 2480884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
    Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 May; 45(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 9581055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source reconstruction of brain electromagnetic fields--source iteration of minimum norm (SIMN).
    Liang WK; Wang MS
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1301-11. PubMed ID: 19361564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jan; 37(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 2303269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
    Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MEG and ECoG localization accuracy test.
    Gharib S; Sutherling WW; Nakasato N; Barth DS; Baumgartner C; Alexopoulos N; Taylor S; Rogers RL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Feb; 94(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 7532571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head.
    Haueisen J; Ramon C; Eiselt M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Aug; 44(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 9254986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exactness of source analysis of biomagnetic signals of epileptiform spikes by the method of spatial filtering: a computer simulation.
    Wagner H; Eiselt M; Zwiener U
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1997 Nov; 35(6):708-14. PubMed ID: 9538550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution.
    Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Laarne PH; Malmivuo JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1547-54. PubMed ID: 15376503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.